PharmacoEconomics (2018) 36:973–986 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0640-7 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparing the Relative Importance of Attributes of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatments to Patients and Physicians in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment 1 2 3 3 • • • • Juan Marcos Gonza ´ lez Justin Doan David J. Gebben Marco Boeri Mayer Fishman Published online: 5 June 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract attributes conditional on the range of levels of that Objectives Value assessments of new treatments for attribute). metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should include Results Overall, 201 patients and 142 physicians com- outcomes that are most important to patients. This study pleted the survey. For both patients and physicians, PL3Y aimed to quantify and compare the conditional relative was the attribute with the greatest and statistically signiﬁ- importance of the attributes of RCC treatments to patients cant conditional relative importance. Estimates of the and physicians in the United States. conditional relative importance of PFS, skin reactions, and Methods Patients with RCC and physicians who treat RCC mode of administration for patients, and for PFS and mode completed an online discrete-choice experiment survey of administration for physicians, were not statistically with a fractional
PharmacoEconomics – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 5, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud