Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts

Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus... Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2017) 274:3535–3537 DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4374-x LETTE R T O T HE EDI T OR Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts 1 2 Zhufang Jiang Zihan Lou Received: 8 October 2016 / Accepted: 4 November 2016 / Published online: 11 November 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Dear Editors, Tutopatch technique, perforations were not exceeding one- third of the tympanic membrane surface after excision of We would like to comment on the manuscript entitled, the perforation edge with total visibility of the perforation. ‘‘Are bovine pericardium underlay xenograft and butterfly For the butterfly technique, perforations were not inlay autograft efficient for transcanal tympanoplasty?’’ by marginalized and not exceeding one quarter of the tym- de Dorlodot et al. [1]. The authors compared the outcomes panic membrane surface after excision of the perforation of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay edge’’. The size of the perforation can affect the success xenografts and butterfly inlay autografts. This is an inter- rate of tympanoplasty. Onal et al. [2] found a significant esting study and excellent work, which discussed a new difference in success rates between smaller and larger graft material for tympanoplasty. However, the clinical perforations; http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Springer Journals

Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparing-the-outcome-of-tympanoplasties-using-bovine-pericardium-OsTQ1AwRhc
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Otorhinolaryngology; Neurosurgery; Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN
0937-4477
eISSN
1434-4726
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00405-016-4374-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2017) 274:3535–3537 DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4374-x LETTE R T O T HE EDI T OR Comparing the outcome of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay xenografts versus butterfly inlay autografts 1 2 Zhufang Jiang Zihan Lou Received: 8 October 2016 / Accepted: 4 November 2016 / Published online: 11 November 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Dear Editors, Tutopatch technique, perforations were not exceeding one- third of the tympanic membrane surface after excision of We would like to comment on the manuscript entitled, the perforation edge with total visibility of the perforation. ‘‘Are bovine pericardium underlay xenograft and butterfly For the butterfly technique, perforations were not inlay autograft efficient for transcanal tympanoplasty?’’ by marginalized and not exceeding one quarter of the tym- de Dorlodot et al. [1]. The authors compared the outcomes panic membrane surface after excision of the perforation of tympanoplasties using bovine pericardium underlay edge’’. The size of the perforation can affect the success xenografts and butterfly inlay autografts. This is an inter- rate of tympanoplasty. Onal et al. [2] found a significant esting study and excellent work, which discussed a new difference in success rates between smaller and larger graft material for tympanoplasty. However, the clinical perforations;

Journal

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-LaryngologySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 11, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off