Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial

Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients... ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial a b c Seth Uretsky, MD, FACC, Edgar Argulian, MD, MPH, Azhar Supariwala, MD, d b b Shiv K. Agarwal, MD, Georges El-Hayek, MD, Patricia Chavez, MD, b b b Hira Awan, MD, Ashadevi Jagarlamudi, MD, Siva P. Puppala, MD, b b Randy Cohen, MD, and Alan Rozanski, MD Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Morristown Medical Center, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown, NJ Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s Hospital, New York, NY Northshore LIJ Southside Hospital, Hofstra School of Medicine, NSLIJHS, Bayshore, NY Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR Received Aug 18, 2015; accepted Oct 20, 2015 doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0354-6 Background. Because the frequency of cardiac event rates is low among chest pain patients following either performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) or stress testing, there is a need to better assess how these tests influence the central management decisions that follow from cardiac testing. The present study was performed to assess the relative impact of CCTA vs stress testing on http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Springer Journals

Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparative-effectiveness-of-coronary-ct-angiography-vs-stress-cardiac-1fPUyhGxab
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Cardiology; Nuclear Medicine; Imaging / Radiology
ISSN
1071-3581
eISSN
1532-6551
D.O.I.
10.1007/s12350-015-0354-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial a b c Seth Uretsky, MD, FACC, Edgar Argulian, MD, MPH, Azhar Supariwala, MD, d b b Shiv K. Agarwal, MD, Georges El-Hayek, MD, Patricia Chavez, MD, b b b Hira Awan, MD, Ashadevi Jagarlamudi, MD, Siva P. Puppala, MD, b b Randy Cohen, MD, and Alan Rozanski, MD Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Morristown Medical Center, Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown, NJ Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s Hospital, New York, NY Northshore LIJ Southside Hospital, Hofstra School of Medicine, NSLIJHS, Bayshore, NY Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR Received Aug 18, 2015; accepted Oct 20, 2015 doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0354-6 Background. Because the frequency of cardiac event rates is low among chest pain patients following either performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) or stress testing, there is a need to better assess how these tests influence the central management decisions that follow from cardiac testing. The present study was performed to assess the relative impact of CCTA vs stress testing on

Journal

Journal of Nuclear CardiologySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 5, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off