Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2011)
Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference 14 between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior 15 longitudinal ligament? Neurosurg Focus 30:E9
B. Wolf, M. Khilnani, L. Malis (1956)
The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis.Journal of the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, 23 3
Lin-nan Wang, Lei Wang, Yueming Song, Xi Yang, Li-min Liu, Tao Li (2016)
Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up studyInternational Orthopaedics, 40
(2011)
Laminoplasty out- comes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament? Neurosurg Focus 30:E9
M. OʼBrien, D. Peterson, A. Casey, H. Crockard (1996)
A Novel Technique for Laminoplasty Augmentation of Spinal Canal Area Using Titanium Miniplate Stabilization: A Computerized Morphometric AnalysisSpine, 21
Zhengxue Quan (2001)
Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy
P. Cheung, C. Wong, Sin Lau, J. Cheung (2017)
Psychometric Validation of the Adapted Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ)SPINE, 43
Gurpreet Gandhoke, Jau-Ching Wu, Nathan Rowland, S. Meyer, Camilla Gupta, P. Mummaneni (2011)
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty: is the risk of postoperative C-5 palsy different?Neurosurgical focus, 31 4
(2016)
Clinical and radiographic 1 outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini2 plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study
M. Fukui, K. Chiba, M. Kawakami, S. Kikuchi, S. Konno, M. Miyamoto, A. Seichi, T. Shimamura, O. Shirado, T. Taguchi, Kazuhisa Takahashi, K. Takeshita, T. Tani, Y. Toyama, E. Wada, K. Yonenobu, Takashi Tanaka, Y. Hirota (2007)
An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 12
(2014)
An outcome measure for 10 patients with cervical myelopathy: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical 11 Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): an average score of healthy 12 volunteers
Hai-Qiang Wang, K. Mak, D. Samartzis, Tarek El-Fiky, Y. Wong, Zhuojing Luo, Xin-yong Kang, W. Cheung, K. Luk, K. Cheung (2011)
"Spring-back" closure associated with open-door cervical laminoplasty.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 11 9
(2015)
Skipped - level plating for laminoplasty 15 open - door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseases
S Kalsi-Ryan, SK Karadimas, MG Fehlings (2013)
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorderNeurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry, 19
(1999)
Modified expansive open6 door laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy. Journal of spinal disorders
Hua Chen, Yu-xiao Deng, Tao Li, Q. Gong, Yueming Song, Hao Liu (2015)
Clinical and radiography results of mini-plate fixation compared to suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: A five-year follow-up studyClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 138
K. Hirabayashi, K. Wakano, N. Suzuki, K. Satomi, Y. Ishii (1983)
Expansive Open‐Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spinal Stenotic MyelopathySpine, 8
(1976)
Rodts GE (2001) Lami- noplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis
J. Cheung, K. Yiu, D. Samartzis, K. Kwan, B. Tan, K. Cheung (2017)
Rod Lengthening With the Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod: Factors Influencing Rod Slippage and Reduced Gains During DistractionsSPINE, 43
S. Meyer, Jau-Ching Wu, P. Mummaneni (2011)
Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?Neurosurgical focus, 30 3
(2011)
Mum- maneni PV (2011) Anterior corpectomy versus posterior lamino- plasty: is the risk of postoperative C-5 palsy different? Neurosurg Focus 31:E12
H. Deutsch, P. Mummaneni, G. Rodts, R. Haid (2004)
Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty Using a New Plating System: Technical NoteJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 17
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, S. Karadimas, M. Fehlings (2013)
Cervical Spondylotic MyelopathyThe Neuroscientist, 19
Andrew Park, J. Heller (2004)
Cervical Laminoplasty: Use of a Novel Titanium Plate to Maintain Canal Expansion—Surgical TechniqueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 17
Z. Smith, Colin Buchanan, D. Raphael, L. Khoo (2011)
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathogenesis, management, and current surgical approaches. A review.Neurosurgical focus, 30 3
J. Heller, C. Edwards, H. Murakami, G. Rodts (2001)
Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: An Independent Matched Cohort AnalysisSpine, 26
Shan Wang, Shengdan Jiang, Lei-Sheng Jiang, L. Dai (2011)
Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 20
Joji Mochida, Takeshi Nomura, Masahiro Chiba, K. Nishimura, E. Toh (1999)
Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy.Journal of spinal disorders, 12 5
N. Tanaka, S. Konno, K. Takeshita, M. Fukui, Kazuhisa Takahashi, K. Chiba, M. Miyamoto, M. Matsumoto, Y. Kasai, M. Kanamori, S. Matsunaga, N. Hosono, T. Kanchiku, H. Taneichi, H. Hashizume, M. Kanayama, Takachika Shimizu, M. Kawakami (2013)
An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): an average score of healthy volunteersJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 19
H. Shigematsu, J. Cheung, K. Mak, M. Bruzzone, K. Luk (2017)
Cervical spinal canal stenosis first presenting after spinal cord injury due to minor trauma: An insight into the value of preventive decompression.Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 22 1
(2011)
11 Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty : is the risk of postoperative C - 5 palsy 12 different ?
(1976)
an independent matched 19 cohort analysis
A. Humadi, T. Chao, Sulaf Dawood, M. Tacey, A. Barmare, B. Freeman (2017)
A Meta-Analysis of Cervical Laminoplasty Techniques: Are Mini-Plates Superior?Global Spine Journal, 7
Feng-yu Liu, Lei Ma, L. Huo, Yanxiang Cao, Dalong Yang, Hui Wang, Sidong Yang, W. Ding (2017)
Mini-plate fixation versus suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplastyMedicine, 96
Hui-lin Yang, Guangdong Chen, Hong-tao Zhang, Lan Wang, Zong-Ping Luo (2013)
Open-door Laminoplasty With Plate Fixation at Alternating Levels for Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical DiseaseJournal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, 26
R. Hartman, R. Tisherman, Cheng Wang, Kevin Bell, J. Lee, G. Sowa, James Kang (2016)
Mechanical role of the posterior column components in the cervical spineEuropean Spine Journal, 25
K. Hirabayashi, J. Miyakawa, K. Satomi, T. Maruyama, K. Wakano (1981)
Operative Results and Postoperative Progression of Ossification Among Patients With Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal LigamentSpine, 6
(2017)
Mini1 plate fixation versus suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: A meta-analysis. 2 Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6026
(2017)
A Meta17 Analysis of Cervical Laminoplasty Techniques: Are Mini-Plates Superior? Global Spine 18 J 7:373-381
J. Rhee, Bradley Register, T. Hamasaki, Betty Franklin (2011)
Plate-Only Open Door Laminoplasty Maintains Stable Spinal Canal Expansion with High Rates of Hinge Union and No Plate FailuresSpine, 36
Yun‐qi Jiang, Xi‐lei Li, Xiao‐gang Zhou, Chong Bian, Han-ming Wang, Jian-ming Huang, Jian Dong (2017)
A prospective randomized trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus plate-only open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseasesEuropean Spine Journal, 26
K. Hirabayashi, K. Satomi (1988)
Operative Procedure and Results of Expansive Open-Door LaminoplastySpine, 13
(1981)
Operative results 19 and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical 20 posterior longitudinal ligament
Guangdong Chen, Zongping Luo, Badri Nalajala, Tao Liu, Huilin Yang (2012)
Expansive open-door laminoplasty with titanium miniplate versus sutures.Orthopedics, 35 4
Zhengfei Wang, Guangdong Chen, F. Xue, Xiao-Wen Sheng, Hui-lin Yang, J. Qian (2014)
All levels versus alternate levels plate fixation in expansive open door cervical laminoplastyIndian Journal of Orthopaedics, 48
Kam-Lung Tung, P. Cheung, T. Kwok, Kam-Kwong Wong, K. Mak, W. Wong (2015)
Single-Door Cervical Laminoplasty Using Titanium Miniplates AloneJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 23
Shota Ikegami, J. Takahashi, Hiromichi Misawa, T. Tsutsumimoto, Mutsuki Yui, S. Kuraishi, Toshimasa Futatsugi, Masashi Uehara, Hiroki Oba, H. Kato (2017)
Spinal cord MRI signal changes at 1 year after cervical decompression surgery is useful for predicting midterm clinical outcome: an observational study using propensity scores.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 18 5
(2017)
Mini - 1 plate fixation versus suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty : A meta - analysis
(2001)
Laminoplasty versus 18 laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy : an independent matched 19 cohort analysis
K. Abdullah, T. Yamashita, M. Steinmetz, D. Lubelski, Jeffrey Wang, E. Benzel, T. Mroz (2012)
Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior StructuresGlobal Spine Journal, 2
Purpose To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for cervical laminoplasty. Methods Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) treated by open-door laminoplasty with minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up were included. All patients had opening from C3–6 or C3–7 and were divided into skipped-level or all-level plating groups. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and canal measurements were obtained preopera- tively, immediate (within 1 week) postoperatively, and at 2, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Paired t test was used for comparative analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the canal expansion cutoff for spring-back closure. Results A total of 74 subjects were included with mean age of 66.1 ± 11.3 years at surgery. Of these, 32 underwent skipped- level plating and 42 underwent all-level plating. No significant differences were noted between the two groups at baseline and follow-up. Spring-back closure was observed in up to 50% of the non-plated levels within 3 months postoperatively. The cutoff for developing spring-back closure was 7 mm canal expansion for C3–6. No differences were observed in JOA scores and recovery rates between the two groups. None of the patients with spring-back required reoperation. Conclusions There were no significant differences between skipped-level and all-level plating
European Spine Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 28, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.