Comments on ``Coverage of the Population in Census 2000: Results from Demographic Analysis'' and ``Demographic comparison between self-response and personal visit interview in Census 2000'', Population Research and Policy Review, Special Issue: Census 2000

Comments on ``Coverage of the Population in Census 2000: Results from Demographic Analysis'' and... Population Research and Policy Review 21: 53–54, 2002. © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Comments on “Coverage of the Population in Census 2000: Results from Demographic Analysis” and “Demographic comparison between self-response and personal visit interview in Census 2000”, Population Research and Policy Review, Special Issue: Census 2000 PETER SKERRY Claremont McKenna College and the Brookings Institution To a public-policy-oriented political scientist who has not devoted his en- tire career to the census, these two articles impress me, once again, with the seriousness of purpose with which those whose professional lives have focused on this basic and critically important governmental function pursue their craft. I am also reminded that this seriousness of purpose has resulted in progress vis-a-vis the long-standing problem of the differential minority undercount. But of course this is progress leavened with reminders of the continuing challenges ahead. The good news begins with the finding highlighted in “Demographic com- parison between self-response and personal visit interview in Census 2000” that the mail return held its own in 2000, compared to 1990. Even more to the point, of course, the net undercount was reduced in 2000, including the differential minority undercounts. But these gains obviously http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Population Research and Policy Review Springer Journals

Comments on ``Coverage of the Population in Census 2000: Results from Demographic Analysis'' and ``Demographic comparison between self-response and personal visit interview in Census 2000'', Population Research and Policy Review, Special Issue: Census 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comments-on-coverage-of-the-population-in-census-2000-results-from-vNOgamQqVe
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Social Sciences; Demography; Sociology, general; Population Economics
ISSN
0167-5923
eISSN
1573-7829
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1016583331965
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial