International Urogynecology Journal (2018) 29:455–456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3529-7 COMMENTARY Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study Tamara Grisales Received: 19 November 2017 /Accepted: 27 November 2017 /Published online: 29 December 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 The authors of this study compared the uterus-sparing USLS. Mean follow-up periods were similar in the two Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) with vaginal hysterecto- groups: 48 months in the VH group and 51 months in the my (VH) with native tissue repair for the management of apical/ MP group. uterine prolapse. They synthesized data from four Danish nation- Recurrent prolapse and de novo prolapse in any compart- al databases to obtain a comprehensive set of information includ- ment were more common after VH. Recurrence in any com- ing demographics and patient characteristics, preoperative short- partment was 7.8% after MP and 18.3% after VH (p = form questionnaire and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse 0.0002). Recurrence after MP and VH was further stratified Quantification (POP-Q) results, surgeon experience, and compli- by compartment: (1) apical 0.3% and 5.1% (p =0.0004), (2) cations. The study was performed as a historical cohort matched anterior 4.1% and 11.2% (p = 0.0002), and
International Urogynecology Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 29, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera