Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study

Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral... International Urogynecology Journal (2018) 29:455–456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3529-7 COMMENTARY Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study Tamara Grisales Received: 19 November 2017 /Accepted: 27 November 2017 /Published online: 29 December 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 The authors of this study compared the uterus-sparing USLS. Mean follow-up periods were similar in the two Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) with vaginal hysterecto- groups: 48 months in the VH group and 51 months in the my (VH) with native tissue repair for the management of apical/ MP group. uterine prolapse. They synthesized data from four Danish nation- Recurrent prolapse and de novo prolapse in any compart- al databases to obtain a comprehensive set of information includ- ment were more common after VH. Recurrence in any com- ing demographics and patient characteristics, preoperative short- partment was 7.8% after MP and 18.3% after VH (p = form questionnaire and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse 0.0002). Recurrence after MP and VH was further stratified Quantification (POP-Q) results, surgeon experience, and compli- by compartment: (1) apical 0.3% and 5.1% (p =0.0004), (2) cations. The study was performed as a historical cohort matched anterior 4.1% and 11.2% (p = 0.0002), and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Urogynecology Journal Springer Journals

Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/commentary-on-the-manchester-fothergill-procedure-versus-vaginal-WvwzEJIyky
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The International Urogynecological Association
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Gynecology; Urology
ISSN
0937-3462
eISSN
1433-3023
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00192-017-3529-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International Urogynecology Journal (2018) 29:455–456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3529-7 COMMENTARY Commentary on: The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study Tamara Grisales Received: 19 November 2017 /Accepted: 27 November 2017 /Published online: 29 December 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 The authors of this study compared the uterus-sparing USLS. Mean follow-up periods were similar in the two Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) with vaginal hysterecto- groups: 48 months in the VH group and 51 months in the my (VH) with native tissue repair for the management of apical/ MP group. uterine prolapse. They synthesized data from four Danish nation- Recurrent prolapse and de novo prolapse in any compart- al databases to obtain a comprehensive set of information includ- ment were more common after VH. Recurrence in any com- ing demographics and patient characteristics, preoperative short- partment was 7.8% after MP and 18.3% after VH (p = form questionnaire and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse 0.0002). Recurrence after MP and VH was further stratified Quantification (POP-Q) results, surgeon experience, and compli- by compartment: (1) apical 0.3% and 5.1% (p =0.0004), (2) cations. The study was performed as a historical cohort matched anterior 4.1% and 11.2% (p = 0.0002), and

Journal

International Urogynecology JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 29, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off