Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Commentary on “Late complications after application of polyacrylamide hydrogel” by Evstatiev

Commentary on “Late complications after application of polyacrylamide hydrogel” by Evstatiev Eur J Plast Surg (2006) 29: 137–138 DOI 10.1007/s00238-006-0058-x INVITED COMMENTARY I. Ankorina-Stark V. Breiting Commentary on “Late complications after application of polyacrylamide hydrogel” by Evstatiev Published online: 21 April 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 This paper is a summary of different complications noted The mammography photo is useless, as it is under- after injections of polyacrylamide hydrogel into different exposed. There is no contrast between gel and tissue. The parts of the human body; these were all performed by ultrasound photos could just as well stem from a normal doctors in other countries or institutions. Unfortunately, breast without gel having been implanted. there is a total lack of anamnestic data. The paper does not give any information on who administered the injection or where the injections had been placed or how many Comments to the discussion section injections had been given originally. It is essential to know the origin of the gel, its sterility, and the conditions How can it be claimed that all of the complications are under which the gel was originally injected. related to the gel itself when it was truthfully acknowl- There are no pre-injection or even pre-complication edged in seven cases that microorganisms were http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Commentary on “Late complications after application of polyacrylamide hydrogel” by Evstatiev

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/commentary-on-late-complications-after-application-of-polyacrylamide-hXyaLnCtLS

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
DOI
10.1007/s00238-006-0058-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2006) 29: 137–138 DOI 10.1007/s00238-006-0058-x INVITED COMMENTARY I. Ankorina-Stark V. Breiting Commentary on “Late complications after application of polyacrylamide hydrogel” by Evstatiev Published online: 21 April 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 This paper is a summary of different complications noted The mammography photo is useless, as it is under- after injections of polyacrylamide hydrogel into different exposed. There is no contrast between gel and tissue. The parts of the human body; these were all performed by ultrasound photos could just as well stem from a normal doctors in other countries or institutions. Unfortunately, breast without gel having been implanted. there is a total lack of anamnestic data. The paper does not give any information on who administered the injection or where the injections had been placed or how many Comments to the discussion section injections had been given originally. It is essential to know the origin of the gel, its sterility, and the conditions How can it be claimed that all of the complications are under which the gel was originally injected. related to the gel itself when it was truthfully acknowl- There are no pre-injection or even pre-complication edged in seven cases that microorganisms were

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.