Commentary on “Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based education?,” A review by Keulers et al.

Commentary on “Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based education?,”... Eur J Plast Surg (2003) 26:377 DOI 10.1007/s00238-003-0555-0 LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR F. Barton Commentary on “Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based education?,” A review by Keulers et al. Published online: 12 November 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 The title query of the article, ”Can face-to-face education I would suspect that even within the broad field of be replaced by computer-based education?” points to the plastic surgery, application would vary. In reconstructive emerging dilemma of the role of artificial intelligence in surgery, the defect is definite, even if severity varies. society as a whole, and in medicine, in particular. The Treatment options may be multiple, but they are definable review well documents the increasing retention of learn- and similar from surgeon to surgeon. Therefore, stan- ing as the number of senses stimulated increases, with dardized education of the problem could be valuable. multimedia interactive methods being the most effective. Cleft lip deformity is such an example. The author’s review of the literature seems to suggest Cosmetic surgery is perhaps the biggest hurdle for an affirmative answer to the query. However, as he points computer-based education. First, the indications are very out none of the studies were done on plastic surgery subjective. Second, surgical procedures are not well patients. I would suspect that the effectiveness of standardized among surgeons. Finally, determining pa- multimedia is greatly dependent upon the type of material tient motivation and expectation may be the most being communicated. important of all. I find this difficult determination to best The majority of medical and surgical information is be made by listening to the responses of the patient during quantifiable and has rather consistent deductive reason- a seemingly unrelated explanation of the potential proce- ing. The indications for gall bladder removal are pretty dures. much agreed upon, the methods of removal reasonably In summary, the author makes a convincing case for standardized, and the results measurable. Such informa- the value of multimedia education in selected situations. It tion lends itself to interactive education. The increasing probably has value in explaining the diagnosis in most utilization of internet resources such as WebMD is a good areas. Its value in explaining treatments, however, greatly example. However, as information becomes more sub- diminishes as the variability of procedures and of jective, standardization of multimedia is more difficult. expectations becomes more subjective. This commentary refers to the article which can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0554-1 F. Barton ( ) Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute, 411 N. Washington Ave., Suite 600, LB 13, Dallas, TX 75246, USA e-mail: febart@earthlink.net http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Commentary on “Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based education?,” A review by Keulers et al.

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/commentary-on-can-face-to-face-patient-education-be-replaced-by-lRrMBMnGXQ
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-003-0555-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2003) 26:377 DOI 10.1007/s00238-003-0555-0 LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR F. Barton Commentary on “Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based education?,” A review by Keulers et al. Published online: 12 November 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 The title query of the article, ”Can face-to-face education I would suspect that even within the broad field of be replaced by computer-based education?” points to the plastic surgery, application would vary. In reconstructive emerging dilemma of the role of artificial intelligence in surgery, the defect is definite, even if severity varies. society as a whole, and in medicine, in particular. The Treatment options may be multiple, but they are definable review well documents the increasing retention of learn- and similar from surgeon to surgeon. Therefore, stan- ing as the number of senses stimulated increases, with dardized education of the problem could be valuable. multimedia interactive methods being the most effective. Cleft lip deformity is such an example. The author’s review of the literature seems to suggest Cosmetic surgery is perhaps the biggest hurdle for an affirmative answer to the query. However, as he points computer-based education. First, the indications are very out none of the studies were done on plastic surgery subjective. Second, surgical procedures are not well patients. I would suspect that the effectiveness of standardized among surgeons. Finally, determining pa- multimedia is greatly dependent upon the type of material tient motivation and expectation may be the most being communicated. important of all. I find this difficult determination to best The majority of medical and surgical information is be made by listening to the responses of the patient during quantifiable and has rather consistent deductive reason- a seemingly unrelated explanation of the potential proce- ing. The indications for gall bladder removal are pretty dures. much agreed upon, the methods of removal reasonably In summary, the author makes a convincing case for standardized, and the results measurable. Such informa- the value of multimedia education in selected situations. It tion lends itself to interactive education. The increasing probably has value in explaining the diagnosis in most utilization of internet resources such as WebMD is a good areas. Its value in explaining treatments, however, greatly example. However, as information becomes more sub- diminishes as the variability of procedures and of jective, standardization of multimedia is more difficult. expectations becomes more subjective. This commentary refers to the article which can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0554-1 F. Barton ( ) Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute, 411 N. Washington Ave., Suite 600, LB 13, Dallas, TX 75246, USA e-mail: febart@earthlink.net

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off