Commentary on “A comparison of two omental lengthening techniques by the pedicled omentum to close a knee disarticulation defect: a case report” by A. Sarlak et al.

Commentary on “A comparison of two omental lengthening techniques by the pedicled omentum to... Eur J Plast Surg (2008) 30:247 DOI 10.1007/s00238-007-0175-1 AUTHOR’S REPLY Commentary on “A comparison of two omental lengthening techniques by the pedicled omentum to close a knee disarticulation defect: a case report” by A. Sarlak et al. Ahmet Y. Sarlak & Bilgehan Tosun & Levent Buluc & Anil Cubukcu Published online: 26 October 2007 Springer-Verlag 2007 We highly appreciate the comments made by Prof. Costa. divisions and lengthening for more distant pedicle applica- As he points out and we have mentioned in our paper, to tion. We think that intraoperative templating is mandatory, cover a knee disarticulation defect pedicled omentum with especially for distal defects. a skin graft is not the first option. A free myocutaneous or a With the more frequent use of endoscopic surgery, sensate cutaneous–myocutaneous flap is definitely a better omental lengthening might be a good alternative in patients choice in a weight-bearing area. having laparotomy with the defects to be covered in the Although seen in a small percentage of cases, knowledge same session. of the anatomical variations are imperative in selective This reply refers to the article http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-007-0174-2. : : : A. Y. Sarlak B. Tosun L. Buluc A. Cubukcu Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey A. Cubukcu Department of Surgery, Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey A. Y. Sarlak (*) Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Umuttepe Kampusu, Uctepeler, 41900 Kocaeli, Turkey e-mail: kouortopcom@yahoo.com DO00175; No of Pages http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Commentary on “A comparison of two omental lengthening techniques by the pedicled omentum to close a knee disarticulation defect: a case report” by A. Sarlak et al.

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/commentary-on-a-comparison-of-two-omental-lengthening-techniques-by-xfny0yEW2J
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-007-0175-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial