Comment on the article: Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial

Comment on the article: Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with... Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2017) 137:1269–1270 DOI 10.1007/s00402-017-2746-3 TRAUMA SURGERY Comment on the article: Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super‑aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5‑year follow‑up of randomized controlled trial 1,2 2 1,2 Filip C. Dolatowski  · Per‑Henrik Randsborg  · Stein Erik Utvåg  · 2,3 Rune Bruhn Jakobsen   Received: 28 May 2017 / Published online: 14 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 We read this paper [1] on the surgical treatment of undis- The authors reported Harris Hip Scores (HHS) with placed femoral neck fractures with great interest since we corresponding standard deviations (SDs) to assess hip pain are involved in a similar trial (registered at Clinicaltrials. and function in the two treatment groups. There were no gov NCT01770769). The published study is original and significant differences in mean HHS scores at any follow- highly relevant because undisplaced fractures have received up time. The largest difference in HHS between the two far less attention than displaced fractures [2]. Furthermore, groups was recorded after 6  months, with a mean HHS the orthopedic community needs to prepare for an increas- (SD) of 76.18 (12.5) in the IF group (n  =  34) and 81.53 ing number of geriatric hip fracture patients as the propor- (11.6) in the HA group (n  =  http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Springer Journals

Comment on the article: Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comment-on-the-article-hemiarthroplasty-versus-internal-fixation-in-uzgeKTv7y7
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics
ISSN
0936-8051
eISSN
1434-3916
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00402-017-2746-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2017) 137:1269–1270 DOI 10.1007/s00402-017-2746-3 TRAUMA SURGERY Comment on the article: Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super‑aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5‑year follow‑up of randomized controlled trial 1,2 2 1,2 Filip C. Dolatowski  · Per‑Henrik Randsborg  · Stein Erik Utvåg  · 2,3 Rune Bruhn Jakobsen   Received: 28 May 2017 / Published online: 14 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 We read this paper [1] on the surgical treatment of undis- The authors reported Harris Hip Scores (HHS) with placed femoral neck fractures with great interest since we corresponding standard deviations (SDs) to assess hip pain are involved in a similar trial (registered at Clinicaltrials. and function in the two treatment groups. There were no gov NCT01770769). The published study is original and significant differences in mean HHS scores at any follow- highly relevant because undisplaced fractures have received up time. The largest difference in HHS between the two far less attention than displaced fractures [2]. Furthermore, groups was recorded after 6  months, with a mean HHS the orthopedic community needs to prepare for an increas- (SD) of 76.18 (12.5) in the IF group (n  =  34) and 81.53 ing number of geriatric hip fracture patients as the propor- (11.6) in the HA group (n  = 

Journal

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jul 14, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off