Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comment on “Testing Bell’s inequality with one party weak measurements”

Comment on “Testing Bell’s inequality with one party weak measurements” In this comment, we falsify the reasoning, given in a recent paper, that it is possible to certify entanglement by acting only on one of the parts of an entangled system. We stress that by assuming the possibility of detecting nonlocality in this way, we dispose of causality by allowing superluminal communication. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quantum Information Processing Springer Journals

Comment on “Testing Bell’s inequality with one party weak measurements”

Quantum Information Processing , Volume 16 (3) – Jan 25, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comment-on-testing-bell-s-inequality-with-one-party-weak-measurements-N4K0x3AeKZ

References (1)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Physics; Quantum Information Technology, Spintronics; Quantum Computing; Data Structures, Cryptology and Information Theory; Quantum Physics; Mathematical Physics
ISSN
1570-0755
eISSN
1573-1332
DOI
10.1007/s11128-016-1469-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this comment, we falsify the reasoning, given in a recent paper, that it is possible to certify entanglement by acting only on one of the parts of an entangled system. We stress that by assuming the possibility of detecting nonlocality in this way, we dispose of causality by allowing superluminal communication.

Journal

Quantum Information ProcessingSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 25, 2017

There are no references for this article.