Comment on Marshall's “Monster, Victim, or Everyman”

Comment on Marshall's “Monster, Victim, or Everyman” Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998 Commentary Comment on Marshall's "Monster, Victim, or Everyman" Vernon L. Quinsey1 INTRODUCTION The scientific literature is, like the Internet, a marketplace of ideas and requires competing views if it is to function effectively. It is in this context that I write this commentary. In my view, Marshall's (1996) paper that recently appeared in this journal misconstrues the scientific approach to sexual offending and sexual offender treatment, in part by conflating moral and scientific concerns and in part by implicitly advocating a weak inference scientific strategy. The original Marshall plan, once described as the most unsordid act in history, transformed war-torn Western Europe. This enormous effort was motivated by both humanitarian and collective security goals and succeeded because of brilliant planning. The more recent Marshall plan appearing in this journal is also motivated by humanitarian and security goals. Unlike its illustrious predecessor, however, it is unclear about how its humanitarian goals could be achieved and, if achieved, how their achievement could be recognized. THE MORAL HIGH GROUND For the purposes of exposition as well as politeness, I will assume that we all occupy the moral high ground. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment Springer Journals

Comment on Marshall's “Monster, Victim, or Everyman”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comment-on-marshall-s-monster-victim-or-everyman-WGUwvNWZHe
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Plenum Publishing Corporation
Subject
Psychology; Sexual Behavior; Psychiatry; Clinical Psychology; Criminology and Criminal Justice, general
ISSN
1079-0632
eISSN
1573-286X
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1022158715794
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998 Commentary Comment on Marshall's "Monster, Victim, or Everyman" Vernon L. Quinsey1 INTRODUCTION The scientific literature is, like the Internet, a marketplace of ideas and requires competing views if it is to function effectively. It is in this context that I write this commentary. In my view, Marshall's (1996) paper that recently appeared in this journal misconstrues the scientific approach to sexual offending and sexual offender treatment, in part by conflating moral and scientific concerns and in part by implicitly advocating a weak inference scientific strategy. The original Marshall plan, once described as the most unsordid act in history, transformed war-torn Western Europe. This enormous effort was motivated by both humanitarian and collective security goals and succeeded because of brilliant planning. The more recent Marshall plan appearing in this journal is also motivated by humanitarian and security goals. Unlike its illustrious predecessor, however, it is unclear about how its humanitarian goals could be achieved and, if achieved, how their achievement could be recognized. THE MORAL HIGH GROUND For the purposes of exposition as well as politeness, I will assume that we all occupy the moral high ground.

Journal

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and TreatmentSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 6, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off