Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cityscape quality and resource manipulation affect natural enemy biodiversity in and fidelity to urban agroecosystems

Cityscape quality and resource manipulation affect natural enemy biodiversity in and fidelity to... Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:985–998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0645-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cityscape quality and resource manipulation affect natural enemy biodiversity in and fidelity to urban agroecosystems . . . Monika H. Egerer Heidi Liere Peter Bichier Stacy M. Philpott Received: 12 January 2018 / Accepted: 23 April 2018 / Published online: 4 May 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract wasps) communities and their fidelity to urban Context Complex landscapes with high resource habitats. availability can support more diverse natural enemy Methods We performed two manipulations. First, communities and better natural pest control by we added local floral resources in 6 of 12 gardens providing resources and facilitating organism disper- situated in different cityscapes to measure differences sal. Moreover, in agricultural landscapes, local agroe- in natural enemy biodiversity. Second, in those 12 cosystem management can support biodiversity gardens, with and without resource additions, we maintenance and pest control by adding resources in manipulated populations of a common natural enemy, less complex landscapes with fewer resources. How- Hippodamia convergens, to assess fidelity to the ever, we lack an understanding of how local and gardens. landscape factors interact to affect natural enemy Results Floral resource additions increased para- communities and their http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Landscape Ecology Springer Journals

Cityscape quality and resource manipulation affect natural enemy biodiversity in and fidelity to urban agroecosystems

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/cityscape-quality-and-resource-manipulation-affect-natural-enemy-70uKjKDYuo
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Life Sciences; Landscape Ecology; Ecology; Nature Conservation; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning; Sustainable Development; Environmental Management
ISSN
0921-2973
eISSN
1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-018-0645-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:985–998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0645-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cityscape quality and resource manipulation affect natural enemy biodiversity in and fidelity to urban agroecosystems . . . Monika H. Egerer Heidi Liere Peter Bichier Stacy M. Philpott Received: 12 January 2018 / Accepted: 23 April 2018 / Published online: 4 May 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract wasps) communities and their fidelity to urban Context Complex landscapes with high resource habitats. availability can support more diverse natural enemy Methods We performed two manipulations. First, communities and better natural pest control by we added local floral resources in 6 of 12 gardens providing resources and facilitating organism disper- situated in different cityscapes to measure differences sal. Moreover, in agricultural landscapes, local agroe- in natural enemy biodiversity. Second, in those 12 cosystem management can support biodiversity gardens, with and without resource additions, we maintenance and pest control by adding resources in manipulated populations of a common natural enemy, less complex landscapes with fewer resources. How- Hippodamia convergens, to assess fidelity to the ever, we lack an understanding of how local and gardens. landscape factors interact to affect natural enemy Results Floral resource additions increased para- communities and their

Journal

Landscape Ecology – Springer Journals

Published: May 4, 2018

References

  • Biodiversity in urban habitat patches
    Angold, PG; Sadler, JP; Hill, MO; Pullin, A; Rushton, S; Austin, K; Small, E; Wood, B; Wadsworth, R; Sanderson, R; Thompson, K
  • Inundative release of coccinellid beetles into eucalypt plantations for biological control of chrysomelid leaf beetles
    Baker, SC; Elek, JA; Bashford, R; Paterson, SC; Madden, J; Battaglia, M
  • Flowers to selectively enhance the fitness of a host-feeding parasitoid: adult feeding by Tuta absoluta and its parasitoid Necremnus artynes
    Balzan, MV; Wäckers, FL
  • Local and landscape scale variables impact parasitoid assemblages across an urbanization gradient
    Bennett, AB; Gratton, C
  • Using animal movement behavior to categorize land cover and predict consequences for connectivity and patch residence times
    Brown, LM; Fuda, RK; Schtickzelle, N; Coffman, H; Jost, A; Kazberouk, A; Kemper, E; Sass, E; Crone, EE
  • Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information—theoretic approach
    Burnham, KP; Anderson, DR
  • Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification
    Cadenasso, ML; Pickett, STA; Schwarz, K
  • glmulti: an R Package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models
    Calcagno, V; Mazancourt, C
  • A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity
    Chaplin-Kramer, R; O’Rourke, ME; Blitzer, EJ; Kremen, C
  • Quantifying movement of a minute parasitoid, Anagrus epos (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), using fluorescent dust marking and recapture
    Corbett, A; Rosenheim, JA
  • Plant-insect communities and predator-prey ratios in field margin strips, adjacent crop fields, and fallows
    Denys, C; Tscharntke, T
  • Landscape and local habitat correlates of lady beetle abundance and species richness in urban agriculture
    Egerer, MH; Bichier, P; Philpott, SM
  • Urban arthropods respond variably to changes in landscape context and spatial scale
    Egerer, MH; Arel, C; Otoshi, MD; Quistberg, RD; Bichier, P; Philpott, SM
  • Conservation biological control in urban landscapes: manipulating parasitoids of bagworm (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) with flowering forbs
    Ellis, JA; Walter, AD; Tooker, JF; Ginzel, MD; Reagel, PF; Lacey, ES; Bennett, AB; Grossman, EM; Hanks, LM
  • ArcGIS desktop: release 10
  • How much habitat is enough?
    Fahrig, L
  • Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity
    Fahrig, L
  • Integrated pest management for home gardeners and landscape integrated landscape professionals
    Flint, M
  • Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization
    Gámez-Virués, S; Perović, DJ; Gossner, MM; Börschig, C; Blüthgen, N; de Jong, H; Simons, NK; Klein, A-M; Krauss, J; Maier, G; Scherber, C; Steckel, J; Rothenwöhrer, C; Steffan-Dewenter, I; Weiner, CN; Weisser, W; Werner, M; Tscharntke, T; Westphal, C
  • Landscape composition influences patterns of native and exotic lady beetle abundance
    Gardiner, MM; Landis, DA; Gratton, C; Schmidt, N; O’Neal, M; Mueller, E; Chacon, J; Heimpel, GE; Difonzo, CD
  • A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011
    Jin, S; Yang, L; Danielson, P; Homer, C; Fry, J; Xian, G
  • Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta: patch size and surrounding habitat
    Kareiva, P
  • Swarms of predators exhibit “preytaxis” if individual predators use area-restricted search
    Kareiva, P; Odell, G
  • Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation
    Kowarik, I
  • Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?
    Kremen, C
  • Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change
    Kremen, C; Williams, NM; Aizen, MA; Gemmill-Herren, B; LeBuhn, G; Minckley, R; Packer, L; Potts, SG; Roulston, T; Steffan-Dewenter, I; Vázquez, DP; Winfree, R; Adams, L; Crone, EE; Greenleaf, SS; Keitt, TH; Klein, AM; Regetz, J; Ricketts, TH
  • Local- and landscape-scale land cover affects microclimate and water use in urban gardens
    Lin, BB; Egerer, MH; Liere, H; Jha, S; Bichier, P; Philpott, SM
  • Ecological light pollution
    Longcore, T; Rich, C
  • Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes
    Loreau, M; Mouquet, N; Gonzalez, A
  • Behavioral responses to resource heterogeneity can accelerate biological invasions
    Lutscher, F; Musgrave, JA
  • The theory of island biogeography
    MacArthur, RH; Wilson, EO
  • Scale-dependent effects of landscape composition and configuration on natural enemy diversity, crop herbivory, and yields
    Martin, EA; Seo, B; Park, CR; Reineking, B; Steffan-Dewenter, I
  • Bumble bee abundance in New York City community gardens: implications for urban agriculture
    Matteson, KC; Langellotto, GA
  • Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action
    McIntyre, NE
  • Influence of two mass-marking techniques on survival and flight behavior of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Naranjo, S
  • Local and landscape correlates of spider activity density and species richness in urban gardens
    Otoshi, MD; Bichier, P; Philpott, SM
  • Modification of a community garden to attract native bee pollinators in urban San Luis Obispo, California
    Pawelek, J; Frankie, GW; Thorp, RW; Przybylski, M
  • Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in Southern Mexico
    Perfecto, I; Vandermeer, J
  • Ecology of herbivorous arthropods in urban landscapes
    Raupp, MJ; Shrewsbury, PM; Herms, DA
  • The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes
    Ricketts, TH
  • A multi-scale, landscape approach to predicting insect populations in agroecosystems
    Rourke, MEO; Rienzo-stack, K; Power, AG; El, H; Rourke, EO
  • Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services
    Schellhorn, NA; Gagic, V; Bommarco, R
  • Connecting scales: achieving in-field pest control from areawide and landscape ecology studies
    Schellhorn, NA; Parry, HR; Macfadyen, S; Wang, Y; Zalucki, MP
  • Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly
    Schultz, CB
  • Does movement behaviour predict population densities? A test with 25 butterfly species
    Schultz, CB; Pe’er, BG; Damiani, C; Brown, L; Crone, EE
  • Evaluation of components of vegetational texture for predicting azalea lace bug, Stephanitis pyrioides (Heteroptera: Tingidae), abundance in managed landscapes
    Shrewsbury, PM; Raupp, MJ
  • Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes
    Tscharntke, T; Brandl, R
  • Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses
    Tscharntke, T; Tylianakis, JM; Rand, TA; Didham, RK; Fahrig, L; Batary, P; Bengtsson, J; Cloug, Y; Crist, To; Dormann, CF; Ewers, RM; Frund, J; Holt, RD; Holzschuh, A; Klein, AM; Kleijn, D; Kremen, C; Landis, DA; Laurance, W; Lindenmayer, D; Scherber, C; Sodhi, N; Steffan-Dewenter, I; Thies, C; van der Putten, WH; Westphal, C
  • Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix
    Vandermeer, J; Carvajal, R
  • Assessing the trophic ecology of the Coccinellidae: their roles as predators and as prey
    Weber, DC; Lundgren, JG
  • Threshold effects of landscape structure on biological control in agroecosystems
    With, KA; Pavuk, DM; Worchuck, JL; Oates, RK; Fisher, JL