Choosing anterior-gear modifications to reduce the global environmental impacts of penaeid trawls

Choosing anterior-gear modifications to reduce the global environmental impacts of penaeid trawls Globally, penaeid-trawl fisheries are faced with three broad sustainability issues: (1) large bycatches; (2) acute benthic-habitat impacts; and (3) high energy consumption. Most resolution efforts have focused on i above, and via bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) installed in the posterior trawl (codend), which typically reduce total bycatches by 30–70%, but are poorly adopted owing to few perceived benefits by fishers. While mandated BRDs will remain a feature of selective penaeid trawling, solutions to habitat impacts and high energy consumption require changes to the anterior trawl, including the spreading mechanisms (e.g. otter boards, beams and sleds), ground gears, and net designs. Further, because such components ultimately determine which organisms enter the codend, it should be feasible to structure anterior-trawl modifications to address all three sustainability issues, including improving selection. We sought to review the feasibility of such an approach here, and located fifty-eight relevant articles: of which 45, 11 and 23 directly or indirectly focused on reducing bycatch, habitat impacts and energy consumption, respectively. Considering these articles, we propose a protocol for holistically improving the environmental efficiency of penaeid trawling involving: (1) selecting the most appropriate multi-net configuration; (2) reducing otter-board angle of attack to ~20°; (3) minimising twine area; and (4) optimising horizontal-trawl opening. Compared to conventional configurations, choosing alternatives within the above protocol could reduce total unwanted bycatches and habitat contact by >70%, while concomitantly lowering drag/fuel costs by >20%. The latter outcome might improve selective penaeid-trawl adoption among global fishing fleets. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Springer Journals

Choosing anterior-gear modifications to reduce the global environmental impacts of penaeid trawls

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/choosing-anterior-gear-modifications-to-reduce-the-global-tKtWea6oPp
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Zoology
ISSN
0960-3166
eISSN
1573-5184
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11160-016-9459-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Globally, penaeid-trawl fisheries are faced with three broad sustainability issues: (1) large bycatches; (2) acute benthic-habitat impacts; and (3) high energy consumption. Most resolution efforts have focused on i above, and via bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) installed in the posterior trawl (codend), which typically reduce total bycatches by 30–70%, but are poorly adopted owing to few perceived benefits by fishers. While mandated BRDs will remain a feature of selective penaeid trawling, solutions to habitat impacts and high energy consumption require changes to the anterior trawl, including the spreading mechanisms (e.g. otter boards, beams and sleds), ground gears, and net designs. Further, because such components ultimately determine which organisms enter the codend, it should be feasible to structure anterior-trawl modifications to address all three sustainability issues, including improving selection. We sought to review the feasibility of such an approach here, and located fifty-eight relevant articles: of which 45, 11 and 23 directly or indirectly focused on reducing bycatch, habitat impacts and energy consumption, respectively. Considering these articles, we propose a protocol for holistically improving the environmental efficiency of penaeid trawling involving: (1) selecting the most appropriate multi-net configuration; (2) reducing otter-board angle of attack to ~20°; (3) minimising twine area; and (4) optimising horizontal-trawl opening. Compared to conventional configurations, choosing alternatives within the above protocol could reduce total unwanted bycatches and habitat contact by >70%, while concomitantly lowering drag/fuel costs by >20%. The latter outcome might improve selective penaeid-trawl adoption among global fishing fleets.

Journal

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 12, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Access to DeepDyve database
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off