Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Treiman, A. Zukowski, D. Richmond-Welty (1995)
What happened to the n of sink: Children's spelling of final consonant clustersCognition, 55
V. Coltheart, J. Leahy (1992)
Children's and adult's reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistencyJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18
R. Treiman, J. Mullennix, R. Bijeljac-Babic, D. Richmond-Welty (1995)
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthographyJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124
C. Barry, P.H.K. Seymour (1988)
Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spellingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A
U. Goswami (1993)
Towards an interactive model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning readingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56
V.J. Laxon, V. Coltheart, C. Keating (1988)
Children find friendly words friendlier too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spellBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 58
R. Treiman (1993)
Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children
U. Frith (1985)
Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading
P.E. Vernon (1977)
Graded word spelling test
J. Walker (1924)
The rhyming dictionary of the English language
U. Goswami (1992)
Annotation: Phonological factors in spelling developmentJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33
M.S. Seidenberg, J.L. McClelland (1989)
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and namingPsychological Review, 96
J. Hansen, J.A. Bowey (1992)
Orthographic rimes as functional units of reading in fourth-grade childrenAustralian Journal of Psychology, 44
R. Treiman, A. Zukowski (1988)
Units in reading and spellingJournal of Memory and Language, 27
V. Laxon, J. Masterson, R. Moran (1994)
Are children's representations of words distributed? Effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency, and regularity of namingLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 9
C.D. Elliot, D.J. Murray, L.S. Pearson (1983)
The British abilities scales
G.D.A. Brown (1987)
Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word namingJournal of Memory and Language, 23
D. Jared, K. McRae, M.S. Seidenberg (1990)
Journal of Memory and Language
G. Marsh, M.P. Friedman, P. Desberg, K. Saterdhal (1981)
Intelligence and learning
M. Snowling, C. Hulme (1991)
Language and the creation of literacy
K. Nation, C. Hulme (1997)
Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation predicts early reading and spelling skillsReading Research Quarterly, 32
K. Nation, C. Hulme (1996)
The automatic activation of sound-letter knowledge: An alternative interpretation of analogy and priming effects in early spelling developmentJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63
L.C. Ehri, C. Robbins (1992)
Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogyReading Research Quarterly, 27
U. Goswami (1988)
Children's use of analogy in learning to spellBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6
F.M. Hatfield, K.E. Patterson (1983)
Phonological spellingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A
J.A. Bowey, J. Hansen (1994)
The development of orthographic rimes as units of word recognitionJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58
G.D.A. Brown, R.P.W. Loosemore (1994)
Handbook of spelling research: Theory, process and intervention
M. Snowling, C. Hulme (1994)
The development of phonological skillsPhilosophical Translations of the Royal Society, 346
M.L. Stanback (1992)
Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 wordsAnnals of Dyslexia, 42
J.B. Carroll, P. Davies, B. Richman (1971)
Word frequency book
U. Goswami, P.E. Bryant (1990)
Phonological skills and learning to read
R. Treiman, U. Goswami, M. Bruck (1990)
Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theoryMemory & Cognition, 18
This paper presents two experiments investigating 8–9 year old children's sensitivity to rime level sound-spelling correspondence units when spelling words and nonwords. In Experiment 1, children spelled more words correctly if they contained a common rime unit rather than a unique or irregular unit. In Experiment 2, children spelled more words and nonwords correctly if they had many rime unit neighbours; words and nonwords with average or few rime unit neighbours were spelled less well. These findings show that children's spelling can not be described simply according to one-to-one phoneme-grapheme mapping. Instead, children are sensitive to lexical factors such as rime unit sound-spelling correspondence. The findings are interpreted within the framework of a connectionist model of spelling development.
Reading and Writing – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 29, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.