Capsule Commentary on Njeru et al., Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Capsule Commentary on Njeru et al., Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Patients with Limited... Capsule Commentary on Njeru et al., Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Amy Cunningham, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. J Gen Intern Med 33(6):947 The findings from Njeru et al. suggest fruitful avenues for DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4422-x future research. Overall, the LEP population in the USA is © Society of General Internal Medicine 2018 very linguistically and culturally heterogeneous with substan- tial variations in country of origin, education level, and socio- economic status. Development and evaluation of DSME for specific LEP sub-populations would strengthen the evidence for DSME’s impact on LEP participants and clarify the most imited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with nu- effective intervention components for different groups. For merous health disparities, including poorer glycemic con- clinicians and health educators, understanding their local 1 2 trol in LEP patients with diabetes. In this issue, Njeru et al. LEP populations and working with community partners is report findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis critical to designing linguistically and culturally appropriate of diabetes self-management education (DSME) interven- DSME to meet the needs of this vulnerable population. tions in LEP populations. In their meta-analysis, DSME interventions were associated with a significant lower he- moglobin A (− 0.84% [95% CI, − 0.97 to − 0.71]) than 1c Corresponding Author: Amy Cunningham, PhD, MPH; Department usual care. Interventions lasting less than 6 months and of Family and Community Medicine Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA (e-mail: Amy.Cunningham@jefferson.edu). using in-person delivery were more likely to demonstrate improvements in hemoglobin A . Improvements in self- 1c Compliance with Ethical Standards: efficacy, quality of life, and several other measures were also reported. Conflict of Interest: The author declares that she does not have a This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to conflict of interest. examine the impact of DSME in LEP populations, and in- cludes a sizable number of articles. The clinically significant reduction in hemoglobin A and positive effects on self- 1c REFERENCES efficacy and quality of life are encouraging findings that are 1. Choi S, Lee JA, Rush E. Ethnic and language disparities in diabetes care consistent with prior meta-analyses of DSME’seffect in the among California residents. Ethn Dis. 2011;21(2):183–9. 3 4 2. Njeru JW, Wieland ML, Kwete G, Tan EM, Breitkopf CR, general population and in racial and ethnic minority groups. Agunwamba AA, Prokop LJ, Murad MH. Diabetes mellitus manage- The study also has several notable limitations. Nearly half of ment among patients with limited english proficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606- the included studies were non-randomized designs. Addition- 017-4237-1. ally, none of the interventions enrolled exclusively LEP par- 3. Steinsbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based ticipants, and for nearly half of included studies, LEP partic- diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta- ipation rates were Binferred^ from demographics tables or the analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):213. article text. Furthermore, nearly all studies (94%) offered LEP 4. Ricci-Cabello I, Ruiz-Pérez I, Rojas-García A, Pastor G, Rodríguez- Barranco M, Gonçalves DC. Characteristics and effectiveness of diabetes accommodations, such as language-concordant staff or trans- self-management educational programs targeted to racial/ethnic minority lated materials, but it was unclear which accommodations groups: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC were most helpful to participants. Finally, the overall hetero- Endocr Disord. 2014;14(1):60. 5. Pandya C, Batalova J, McHugh M. Limited English proficient individuals geneity of the interventions, including delivery methods and in the United States: number, share, growth, and linguistic diversity intensity, precludes conclusions about the most effective [Internet]. Washington (DC): Migration Policy Institute; 2011 [cited 2017 Nov 28]. Available from: http://www.migrationinformation.org/integra- DSME designs for LEP populations. tion/LEPdatabrief.pdf. Published online April 9, 2018 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of General Internal Medicine Springer Journals

Capsule Commentary on Njeru et al., Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/capsule-commentary-on-njeru-et-al-diabetes-mellitus-management-among-0i2pPf2kbS
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Society of General Internal Medicine
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Internal Medicine
ISSN
0884-8734
eISSN
1525-1497
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11606-018-4422-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Capsule Commentary on Njeru et al., Diabetes Mellitus Management Among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Amy Cunningham, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. J Gen Intern Med 33(6):947 The findings from Njeru et al. suggest fruitful avenues for DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4422-x future research. Overall, the LEP population in the USA is © Society of General Internal Medicine 2018 very linguistically and culturally heterogeneous with substan- tial variations in country of origin, education level, and socio- economic status. Development and evaluation of DSME for specific LEP sub-populations would strengthen the evidence for DSME’s impact on LEP participants and clarify the most imited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with nu- effective intervention components for different groups. For merous health disparities, including poorer glycemic con- clinicians and health educators, understanding their local 1 2 trol in LEP patients with diabetes. In this issue, Njeru et al. LEP populations and working with community partners is report findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis critical to designing linguistically and culturally appropriate of diabetes self-management education (DSME) interven- DSME to meet the needs of this vulnerable population. tions in LEP populations. In their meta-analysis, DSME interventions were associated with a significant lower he- moglobin A (− 0.84% [95% CI, − 0.97 to − 0.71]) than 1c Corresponding Author: Amy Cunningham, PhD, MPH; Department usual care. Interventions lasting less than 6 months and of Family and Community Medicine Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA (e-mail: Amy.Cunningham@jefferson.edu). using in-person delivery were more likely to demonstrate improvements in hemoglobin A . Improvements in self- 1c Compliance with Ethical Standards: efficacy, quality of life, and several other measures were also reported. Conflict of Interest: The author declares that she does not have a This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to conflict of interest. examine the impact of DSME in LEP populations, and in- cludes a sizable number of articles. The clinically significant reduction in hemoglobin A and positive effects on self- 1c REFERENCES efficacy and quality of life are encouraging findings that are 1. Choi S, Lee JA, Rush E. Ethnic and language disparities in diabetes care consistent with prior meta-analyses of DSME’seffect in the among California residents. Ethn Dis. 2011;21(2):183–9. 3 4 2. Njeru JW, Wieland ML, Kwete G, Tan EM, Breitkopf CR, general population and in racial and ethnic minority groups. Agunwamba AA, Prokop LJ, Murad MH. Diabetes mellitus manage- The study also has several notable limitations. Nearly half of ment among patients with limited english proficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606- the included studies were non-randomized designs. Addition- 017-4237-1. ally, none of the interventions enrolled exclusively LEP par- 3. Steinsbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based ticipants, and for nearly half of included studies, LEP partic- diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta- ipation rates were Binferred^ from demographics tables or the analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):213. article text. Furthermore, nearly all studies (94%) offered LEP 4. Ricci-Cabello I, Ruiz-Pérez I, Rojas-García A, Pastor G, Rodríguez- Barranco M, Gonçalves DC. Characteristics and effectiveness of diabetes accommodations, such as language-concordant staff or trans- self-management educational programs targeted to racial/ethnic minority lated materials, but it was unclear which accommodations groups: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC were most helpful to participants. Finally, the overall hetero- Endocr Disord. 2014;14(1):60. 5. Pandya C, Batalova J, McHugh M. Limited English proficient individuals geneity of the interventions, including delivery methods and in the United States: number, share, growth, and linguistic diversity intensity, precludes conclusions about the most effective [Internet]. Washington (DC): Migration Policy Institute; 2011 [cited 2017 Nov 28]. Available from: http://www.migrationinformation.org/integra- DSME designs for LEP populations. tion/LEPdatabrief.pdf. Published online April 9, 2018

Journal

Journal of General Internal MedicineSpringer Journals

Published: Apr 9, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off