Breast and chest asymmetries: classification and relative distribution of common asymmetries in patients requesting augmentation mammoplasty

Breast and chest asymmetries: classification and relative distribution of common asymmetries in... Asymmetries of the breast and chest wall are common but a comprehensive classification of these asymmetries and their relative distribution is lacking in the literature. These asymmetries can be primarily due to breast size and shape or nipple areolar complex size or level discrepancy respectively. Breast asymmetries may also arise secondarily due to abnormalities of the underlying bony or soft tissues. A prospective recording of 312 augmentation mammoplasties performed by the author, from January to December 2007, were reviewed to assess breast and chest wall deformities together with an incidence and their relative distribution. From January to December 2007, 312 augmentation mammoplasties were performed. Mean age of the patients was 30.4 ± 9.1 years (range 18–58). Mean size of the implant was 325 ± 53 cm 3 (range 200–620). Different size implants were used in 9% patients with a mean difference of 56.3 ± 33.7 cm 3 (range 20–180). Patients were assessed for asymmetry of breast, chest, distance between jugular notch to nipple areolar complex and nipple areolar complex to inframammary crease. Breast Volume Asymmetries: Breasts were symmetrical in 53.5% ( n = 167). Left breast was larger in 29.8% ( n = 93) as compared to 16.7% ( n = 52) on the right, and the difference was significant ( P value < 0.001). Chest Wall Asymmetries: Chest wall was symmetrical in 89.7% ( n = 280) and thoracic deformities or asymmetries were seen in 8.6% ( n = 27). Chest wall and ribs were more prominent on the left side in 6.7% ( n = 21) as compared to 1.9% ( n = 6) on the right, and the difference was significant ( P value < 0.003) Pectus excavatum and carinatum was seen in 0.6% ( n = 2) and 1% ( n = 3), respectively. Jugular Notch to Nipple Areolar Complex Distance Differences: Jugular notch to nipple areolar complex (NAC) distance was same on two sides in 67.2% with a mean distance of 19.7 cm ( n = 207). In group (21.4%) with the left breast NAC lower ( n = 66) the mean left NAC was 20.7 cm when compared to 19.04 cm on right. In group (11.2%) with right NAC lower than the left ( n = 35), the mean NAC on the right was 21.2 cm as compared to 20.4 cm on the left. The left breast NAC ( n = 66) was measured almost twice as low as the right ( n = 35), and the difference between the two groups was significant ( p value < 0.001). Nipple Areolar Complex to Inframammary Crease Distance Differences: Nipple to inframammary crease (IMC) distance was similar in 77.1% of patients with a mean of 6.69 cm. The group ( n = 40) with higher measured distance on the left (13.1%), left mean nipple to IMC crease distance was 6.9 cm as compared to 6.17 cm on the right. The group ( n = 30) with a higher measured nipple to IMC distance on the right (9.8%), the mean distance on the right was 7.12 cm as compared to 6.52 cm on the left. Though the incidence of the measured nipple to IMC distance was more common on the left ( n = 40) than to the right (30), the difference between the two groups was without any statistical difference ( p value = 0.2). A tuberous breast were seen in 3.9% ( n = 12). Breast and chest wall asymmetries are common and majority of hyperplasias is seen on the left side. The majority of these patients may not require additional surgical manipulation or intervention however proper documentation is essential. European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Breast and chest asymmetries: classification and relative distribution of common asymmetries in patients requesting augmentation mammoplasty

Loading next page...
Copyright © 2011 by Springer-Verlag
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site


You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches


Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.



billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial