Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures

Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2017) 41:1709–1714 DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3444-z ORIGINAL PAPER Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures 1,2 1,2,3 1,2 Patrick A. Varady & Christian von Rüden & Markus Greinwald & 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2 Sven Hungerer & Robert Pätzold & Peter Augat Received: 16 December 2016 /Accepted: 10 March 2017 /Published online: 27 March 2017 The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract systems demonstrated a higher stiffness compared to the 90° Purpose Six different mono-axial and poly-axial distal hu- constructs for the axial loading. In conclusion, both poly-axial meral plating systems with an anatomical plate design were anatomical plating systems provide sufficient stability in this compared. The aim of the biomechanical tests was to examine scenario, and the 180° configurations demonstrated superior differences regarding system stiffness, median fatigue limit, stiffness. and failure mechanisms. Methods Different configurations of two double plate fixation . Keywords Anatomical poly-axial plate Distal humeral . . . systems by two manufacturers for the treatment of complex fracture Failure mechanism Fatigue limit System stiffness distal humeral fractures (AO/OTA type C2.3) were biome- chanically tested in a physiologically relevant setup. Results The 180° Stryker configuration presented itself as http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Orthopaedics Springer Journals

Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/biomechanical-comparison-of-anatomical-plating-systems-for-comminuted-OhpnApErVj
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The Author(s)
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics
ISSN
0341-2695
eISSN
1432-5195
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00264-017-3444-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2017) 41:1709–1714 DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3444-z ORIGINAL PAPER Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures 1,2 1,2,3 1,2 Patrick A. Varady & Christian von Rüden & Markus Greinwald & 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2 Sven Hungerer & Robert Pätzold & Peter Augat Received: 16 December 2016 /Accepted: 10 March 2017 /Published online: 27 March 2017 The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract systems demonstrated a higher stiffness compared to the 90° Purpose Six different mono-axial and poly-axial distal hu- constructs for the axial loading. In conclusion, both poly-axial meral plating systems with an anatomical plate design were anatomical plating systems provide sufficient stability in this compared. The aim of the biomechanical tests was to examine scenario, and the 180° configurations demonstrated superior differences regarding system stiffness, median fatigue limit, stiffness. and failure mechanisms. Methods Different configurations of two double plate fixation . Keywords Anatomical poly-axial plate Distal humeral . . . systems by two manufacturers for the treatment of complex fracture Failure mechanism Fatigue limit System stiffness distal humeral fractures (AO/OTA type C2.3) were biome- chanically tested in a physiologically relevant setup. Results The 180° Stryker configuration presented itself as

Journal

International OrthopaedicsSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 27, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off