Biocontrol strategies using organic substrates such as wood fibers and biocontrol agents such as Trichoderma are currently developed to control soil pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum. Nonetheless, such biocontrol methods give discording results, notably because microbial communities of organic substrates actually are not taken into account. Therefore, there is a lack of information concerning the variability of microbial composition related to the organic substrate type. Here we studied peat, wood and coir fibers, that are substrates known for their different biocontrol efficiency against Fusarium wilt of cucumber. We analyzed in microcosms the microbial composition of wood fibers, coir fibers and peat, incubated up to 60 days, by using an amplicon-sequencing approach based on 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) for fungi. Diversity was assessed by sequencing the 16S rRNA for bacteria and ITS2 region for fungi. Results showed that bacterial richness was threefold higher for coir fiber and peat than for wood fiber. Fungal richness was three times higher for wood and coir fibers compared to peat. Bacterial and fungal patterns showed a dominance of α- and γ- Proteobacteria and Sordariomycetes for coir fiber; β- and γ-Proteobacteria and Eurotiomycetes for wood fibers; Flavobacteria, Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes for peat. In conclusion, results show that substrates have different microbial composition. Finally, for a proper use of a biocontrol strategy is important to take into account the type of substrate.
Environmental Chemistry Letters – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 11, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera