Back to the bog? Subrick, self-interest, and socialist calculation

Back to the bog? Subrick, self-interest, and socialist calculation Rev Austrian Econ (2006) 19: 101–104 DOI 10.1007/s11138-006-6097-5 Back to the bog? Subrick, self-interest, and socialist calculation Eric Crampton · Andrew Farrant C Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006 We welcome the opportunity to clarify our argument (CF 2006) and to respond to Bob Subrick’s pointed queries regarding robust political economy. In particular we shall focus on Subrick’s claim (2006, p. 96) that the Austrian theory of how the worst get on top has not been refuted by the empirical record. We will address Subrick’s claim in the conclusion to this response. Firstly, however, we wish to clarify certain points in our argument (CF 2006), points which Subrick argues lead us to “overstate the implications of . . . [our] results” (Subrick 2006, p. 96). Subrick (pp. 97–8) challenges our simple perfectly-price discriminating monopo- list/monopolist planner analogy, suggesting that we simply assert diminishing marginal utility of income. Whether or not DMU occurs at one hundred thousand, one million, or one trillion dollars per year is largely immaterial to the intuitively plausible claim that in an economy where one agent (our monopoly planner) extracts all surplus, the said planner places a lower marginal valuation on a dollar than does http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Austrian Economics Springer Journals

Back to the bog? Subrick, self-interest, and socialist calculation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/back-to-the-bog-subrick-self-interest-and-socialist-calculation-bH03gsmaRk
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
Subject
Economics; Public Finance; Political Science; History of Economic Thought/Methodology
ISSN
0889-3047
eISSN
1573-7128
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11138-006-6097-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Rev Austrian Econ (2006) 19: 101–104 DOI 10.1007/s11138-006-6097-5 Back to the bog? Subrick, self-interest, and socialist calculation Eric Crampton · Andrew Farrant C Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006 We welcome the opportunity to clarify our argument (CF 2006) and to respond to Bob Subrick’s pointed queries regarding robust political economy. In particular we shall focus on Subrick’s claim (2006, p. 96) that the Austrian theory of how the worst get on top has not been refuted by the empirical record. We will address Subrick’s claim in the conclusion to this response. Firstly, however, we wish to clarify certain points in our argument (CF 2006), points which Subrick argues lead us to “overstate the implications of . . . [our] results” (Subrick 2006, p. 96). Subrick (pp. 97–8) challenges our simple perfectly-price discriminating monopo- list/monopolist planner analogy, suggesting that we simply assert diminishing marginal utility of income. Whether or not DMU occurs at one hundred thousand, one million, or one trillion dollars per year is largely immaterial to the intuitively plausible claim that in an economy where one agent (our monopoly planner) extracts all surplus, the said planner places a lower marginal valuation on a dollar than does

Journal

The Review of Austrian EconomicsSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 1, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off