Author response to: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures

Author response to: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in... J Robotic Surg (2018) 12:387–388 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0747-4 LETTE R T O T HE EDI T OR Author response to: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures 1,2 3 Nicholas J. Brandmeir Michael Sather Received: 22 August 2017 / Accepted: 27 August 2017 / Published online: 31 August 2017 Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017 To the Editor, putting the reported error of all of our applications squarely in the middle of the reported range of in vivo accuracy We are writing in response to the letter by Cardinale and across a wide array of stereotactic devices including ROSA Rizzi [1] regarding our recent manuscript in the Journal of itself. Robotic Surgery, ‘‘The comparative accuracy of the ROSA To expand upon this further, to focus on the mean target stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applica- error itself, rather the comparative accuracy across regis- tions and registration techniques’’ [2]. Unfortunately, there tration methods and applications is to miss the focus of our are several misunderstandings about our paper in this letter study. As we stated in the introduction of our report, our that should be addressed. purpose was to compare techniques, not simply report our First, the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Robotic Surgery Springer Journals

Author response to: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/author-response-to-stereotactic-accuracy-must-be-as-high-as-possible-ZqdJPiE4il
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Surgery; Urology
ISSN
1863-2483
eISSN
1863-2491
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11701-017-0747-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

J Robotic Surg (2018) 12:387–388 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0747-4 LETTE R T O T HE EDI T OR Author response to: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures 1,2 3 Nicholas J. Brandmeir Michael Sather Received: 22 August 2017 / Accepted: 27 August 2017 / Published online: 31 August 2017 Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017 To the Editor, putting the reported error of all of our applications squarely in the middle of the reported range of in vivo accuracy We are writing in response to the letter by Cardinale and across a wide array of stereotactic devices including ROSA Rizzi [1] regarding our recent manuscript in the Journal of itself. Robotic Surgery, ‘‘The comparative accuracy of the ROSA To expand upon this further, to focus on the mean target stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applica- error itself, rather the comparative accuracy across regis- tions and registration techniques’’ [2]. Unfortunately, there tration methods and applications is to miss the focus of our are several misunderstandings about our paper in this letter study. As we stated in the introduction of our report, our that should be addressed. purpose was to compare techniques, not simply report our First, the

Journal

Journal of Robotic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Aug 31, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off