Are quality indicators predictive of compensated injury claims?

Are quality indicators predictive of compensated injury claims? Qual Quant (2017) 51:1903–1919 DOI 10.1007/s11135-016-0373-7 Are quality indicators predictive of compensated injury claims? Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio Published online: 18 June 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 1 Introduction The seminal US report ‘‘To err is human: building a safer health system’’ of the Institute of Medicine (Kohn et al. 2000) has dramatically influenced the debate over clinical errors in healthcare, both in the United States and internationally, establishing healthcare safety as a fundamental issue for health stakeholders and the public opinion. The interest in monitoring adverse events—defined as unintentional injuries or com- plications caused by healthcare management—resulting in disability, death or prolonged hospital stay for hospitalized patients (Harvard Medical Practice Study Investigators 1990), is essentially motivated by the priority to reduce the incidence of medical errors in the health sector, as well as by the financial pressure related to risk and liability insurance costs and reimbursements for damages to patients (Vincent 1997, 2001; Kohn et al. 2000). Although it is difficult to obtain a reliable estimate of errors, there is international consensus that, among hospitalized patients worldwide, 3–16 % suffer injury as a result of medical interventions and at least half of these are preventable adverse events (Leape http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

Are quality indicators predictive of compensated injury claims?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/are-quality-indicators-predictive-of-compensated-injury-claims-0FCaAWotQN
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Social Sciences; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-016-0373-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Qual Quant (2017) 51:1903–1919 DOI 10.1007/s11135-016-0373-7 Are quality indicators predictive of compensated injury claims? Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio Published online: 18 June 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 1 Introduction The seminal US report ‘‘To err is human: building a safer health system’’ of the Institute of Medicine (Kohn et al. 2000) has dramatically influenced the debate over clinical errors in healthcare, both in the United States and internationally, establishing healthcare safety as a fundamental issue for health stakeholders and the public opinion. The interest in monitoring adverse events—defined as unintentional injuries or com- plications caused by healthcare management—resulting in disability, death or prolonged hospital stay for hospitalized patients (Harvard Medical Practice Study Investigators 1990), is essentially motivated by the priority to reduce the incidence of medical errors in the health sector, as well as by the financial pressure related to risk and liability insurance costs and reimbursements for damages to patients (Vincent 1997, 2001; Kohn et al. 2000). Although it is difficult to obtain a reliable estimate of errors, there is international consensus that, among hospitalized patients worldwide, 3–16 % suffer injury as a result of medical interventions and at least half of these are preventable adverse events (Leape

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 18, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial