Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation? Int Urogynecol J (2018) 29:339–344 DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1 1 1 1 Aswini A Balachandran & Swapna Duvalla & Abdul H Sultan & Ranee Thakar Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 18 August 2017 /Published online: 9 September 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Episiotomy Female circumcision Female . . . Introduction and hypothesis Female genital mutilation cutting Female genital mutilation Neonatal outcomes (FGM) has been associated with adverse obstetric and neona- Obstetric outcomes tal outcomes, such as postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), perine- al trauma, genital fistulae, obstructed labour and stillbirth. The prevalence of FGM has increased in the UK over the last Introduction decade. There are currently no studies available that have ex- plored the obstetric impact of FGM in the UK. The aim of our Female genital mutilation (FGM) is defined by the World study was to investigate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes Health Organisation (WHO) as all procedures that involve of women with FGM when compared with the general partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other population. injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or Methods We conducted a retrospective case–control study of other nontherapeutic reasons [1]. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Urogynecology Journal Springer Journals

Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/are-obstetric-outcomes-affected-by-female-genital-mutilation-vGzM2v0sZa
Publisher
Springer London
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The International Urogynecological Association
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Gynecology; Urology
ISSN
0937-3462
eISSN
1433-3023
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Int Urogynecol J (2018) 29:339–344 DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1 1 1 1 Aswini A Balachandran & Swapna Duvalla & Abdul H Sultan & Ranee Thakar Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 18 August 2017 /Published online: 9 September 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Episiotomy Female circumcision Female . . . Introduction and hypothesis Female genital mutilation cutting Female genital mutilation Neonatal outcomes (FGM) has been associated with adverse obstetric and neona- Obstetric outcomes tal outcomes, such as postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), perine- al trauma, genital fistulae, obstructed labour and stillbirth. The prevalence of FGM has increased in the UK over the last Introduction decade. There are currently no studies available that have ex- plored the obstetric impact of FGM in the UK. The aim of our Female genital mutilation (FGM) is defined by the World study was to investigate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes Health Organisation (WHO) as all procedures that involve of women with FGM when compared with the general partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other population. injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or Methods We conducted a retrospective case–control study of other nontherapeutic reasons [1].

Journal

International Urogynecology JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 9, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off