Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation? Int Urogynecol J (2018) 29:339–344 DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1 1 1 1 Aswini A Balachandran & Swapna Duvalla & Abdul H Sultan & Ranee Thakar Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 18 August 2017 /Published online: 9 September 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Episiotomy Female circumcision Female . . . Introduction and hypothesis Female genital mutilation cutting Female genital mutilation Neonatal outcomes (FGM) has been associated with adverse obstetric and neona- Obstetric outcomes tal outcomes, such as postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), perine- al trauma, genital fistulae, obstructed labour and stillbirth. The prevalence of FGM has increased in the UK over the last Introduction decade. There are currently no studies available that have ex- plored the obstetric impact of FGM in the UK. The aim of our Female genital mutilation (FGM) is defined by the World study was to investigate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes Health Organisation (WHO) as all procedures that involve of women with FGM when compared with the general partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other population. injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or Methods We conducted a retrospective case–control study of other nontherapeutic reasons [1]. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Urogynecology Journal Springer Journals

Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/are-obstetric-outcomes-affected-by-female-genital-mutilation-vGzM2v0sZa
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The International Urogynecological Association
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Gynecology; Urology
ISSN
0937-3462
eISSN
1433-3023
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Int Urogynecol J (2018) 29:339–344 DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE 1 1 1 1 Aswini A Balachandran & Swapna Duvalla & Abdul H Sultan & Ranee Thakar Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 18 August 2017 /Published online: 9 September 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Episiotomy Female circumcision Female . . . Introduction and hypothesis Female genital mutilation cutting Female genital mutilation Neonatal outcomes (FGM) has been associated with adverse obstetric and neona- Obstetric outcomes tal outcomes, such as postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), perine- al trauma, genital fistulae, obstructed labour and stillbirth. The prevalence of FGM has increased in the UK over the last Introduction decade. There are currently no studies available that have ex- plored the obstetric impact of FGM in the UK. The aim of our Female genital mutilation (FGM) is defined by the World study was to investigate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes Health Organisation (WHO) as all procedures that involve of women with FGM when compared with the general partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other population. injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or Methods We conducted a retrospective case–control study of other nontherapeutic reasons [1].

Journal

International Urogynecology JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 9, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off