Are more trials of calcium supplements really needed?

Are more trials of calcium supplements really needed? Osteoporos Int (2017) 28:2729–2730 DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-3988-1 LETTER 1,2 1 1 M. J. Bolland & A. Grey & I. R. Reid Received: 8 February 2017 /Accepted: 23 February 2017 /Published online: 7 July 2017 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017 Dear Editor, patient level meta-analysis [5]. If the unverified self-reports After an extensive review, Harvey et al. conclude that co- (all from the RECORD study [6]) are excluded, the hazard administered calcium and vitamin D supplements (but not ratio for myocardial infarction with calcium supplements calcium monotherapy) modestly reduces fractures, but that increases from 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.67, calcium is associated with gastrointestinal side-effects and P = 0.035) to 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.08–1.91, renal stones [1]. They concluded that there is inadequate P = 0.013). Furthermore, the authors accept that calcium evidence for cardiovascular side-effects of calcium supple- supplements increase the risk of kidney stones, even though ments and that a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) is these events were all self-reported, without independent required. verification [7]. Most of the authors’ concerns about analyses reporting The authors call for more large randomized controlled increased cardiovascular risk in RCTs of calcium supple- trials of calcium supplements. Six http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Osteoporosis International Springer Journals

Are more trials of calcium supplements really needed?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/are-more-trials-of-calcium-supplements-really-needed-PzIhwbdre1
Publisher
Springer London
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Endocrinology; Rheumatology
ISSN
0937-941X
eISSN
1433-2965
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00198-017-3988-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Osteoporos Int (2017) 28:2729–2730 DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-3988-1 LETTER 1,2 1 1 M. J. Bolland & A. Grey & I. R. Reid Received: 8 February 2017 /Accepted: 23 February 2017 /Published online: 7 July 2017 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017 Dear Editor, patient level meta-analysis [5]. If the unverified self-reports After an extensive review, Harvey et al. conclude that co- (all from the RECORD study [6]) are excluded, the hazard administered calcium and vitamin D supplements (but not ratio for myocardial infarction with calcium supplements calcium monotherapy) modestly reduces fractures, but that increases from 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.67, calcium is associated with gastrointestinal side-effects and P = 0.035) to 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.08–1.91, renal stones [1]. They concluded that there is inadequate P = 0.013). Furthermore, the authors accept that calcium evidence for cardiovascular side-effects of calcium supple- supplements increase the risk of kidney stones, even though ments and that a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) is these events were all self-reported, without independent required. verification [7]. Most of the authors’ concerns about analyses reporting The authors call for more large randomized controlled increased cardiovascular risk in RCTs of calcium supple- trials of calcium supplements. Six

Journal

Osteoporosis InternationalSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 7, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off