Are blind injections of gleno-humeral joint (GHJ) really less accurate imaging-guided injections? A narrative systematic review considering multiple anatomical approaches

Are blind injections of gleno-humeral joint (GHJ) really less accurate imaging-guided injections?... Radiol med (2017) 122:656–675 DOI 10.1007/s11547-017-0772-4 MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY Are blind injections of gleno‑humeral joint (GHJ) really less accurate imaging‑guided injections? A narrative systematic review considering multiple anatomical approaches 1,2 1 2 1 Paolo Simoni · Marco Grumolato · Olivier Malaise · Marco Preziosi · 3 3 Francoise Pasleau · Fréderic de Lemos Esteves Received: 2 December 2016 / Accepted: 1 May 2017 / Published online: 18 May 2017 © Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2017 Abstract Results The overall accuracy of the intra-articular injec- Aim To perform a systematic review to establish whether tion in GHJ varied from 42 to 100% in the 38 selected stud- blind injections of the gleno-humeral (GHJ) joint may be ies. Imaging guidance was used in 65% of articles and the an accurate alternative to injections performed imaging overall accuracy of guided GHJ injections was higher than guidance, considering multiple anatomical approaches. blind injection. However, five articles in which blind injec - Materials and methods Our search strategy yielded 478 tion the GHJ was used (159 shoulders) reported accuracy articles for Scopus, 815 articles for MEDLINE, 128 arti- as high as 100%. cles for Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Conclusion A comprehensive review http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png La radiologia medica Springer Journals

Are blind injections of gleno-humeral joint (GHJ) really less accurate imaging-guided injections? A narrative systematic review considering multiple anatomical approaches

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/are-blind-injections-of-gleno-humeral-joint-ghj-really-less-accurate-s4Ztv9KdbE
Publisher
Springer Milan
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Italian Society of Medical Radiology
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology; Diagnostic Radiology; Interventional Radiology; Neuroradiology; Ultrasound
ISSN
0033-8362
eISSN
1826-6983
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11547-017-0772-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Radiol med (2017) 122:656–675 DOI 10.1007/s11547-017-0772-4 MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY Are blind injections of gleno‑humeral joint (GHJ) really less accurate imaging‑guided injections? A narrative systematic review considering multiple anatomical approaches 1,2 1 2 1 Paolo Simoni · Marco Grumolato · Olivier Malaise · Marco Preziosi · 3 3 Francoise Pasleau · Fréderic de Lemos Esteves Received: 2 December 2016 / Accepted: 1 May 2017 / Published online: 18 May 2017 © Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2017 Abstract Results The overall accuracy of the intra-articular injec- Aim To perform a systematic review to establish whether tion in GHJ varied from 42 to 100% in the 38 selected stud- blind injections of the gleno-humeral (GHJ) joint may be ies. Imaging guidance was used in 65% of articles and the an accurate alternative to injections performed imaging overall accuracy of guided GHJ injections was higher than guidance, considering multiple anatomical approaches. blind injection. However, five articles in which blind injec - Materials and methods Our search strategy yielded 478 tion the GHJ was used (159 shoulders) reported accuracy articles for Scopus, 815 articles for MEDLINE, 128 arti- as high as 100%. cles for Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Conclusion A comprehensive review

Journal

La radiologia medicaSpringer Journals

Published: May 18, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off