Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Friedewald, E. Rafferty, S. Rose, M. Durand, D. Plecha, Julianne Greenberg, M. Hayes, D. Copit, Kara Carlson, T. Cink, L. Barke, Linda Greer, Dave Miller, E. Conant (2014)
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.JAMA, 311 24
E. Rafferty (2007)
Digital mammography: novel applications.Radiologic clinics of North America, 45 5
E. Conant, Elisabeth Beaber, B. Sprague, S. Herschorn, D. Weaver, T. Onega, A. Tosteson, A. McCarthy, S. Poplack, J. Haas, K. Armstrong, M. Schnall, W. Barlow (2016)
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortiumBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 156
R. Hooley, Kathryn Greenberg, R. Stackhouse, Jaime Geisel, R. Butler, L. Philpotts (2012)
Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.Radiology, 265 1
L. Niklason, B. Christian, L. Niklason, D. Kopans, D. Castleberry, B. Opsahl-Ong, C. Landberg, P. Slanetz, A. Giardino, R. Moore, D. Albagli, M. Dejule, P. Fitzgerald, D Fobare, B. Giambattista, R. Kwasnick, J. Liu, S. Lubowski, G. Possin, J. Richotte, C. Wei, R. Wirth (1997)
Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.Radiology, 205 2
Alison Chetlen, J. Mack, Tiffany Chan (2016)
Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?Clinical imaging, 40 2
D. Bernardi, P. Macaskill, M. Pellegrini, M. Valentini, C. Fantò, Livio Ostillio, P. Tuttobene, A. Luparia, N. Houssami (2016)
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.The Lancet. Oncology, 17 8
S. Rose, A. Tidwell, L. Bujnoch, A. Kushwaha, Amy Nordmann, Russell Sexton (2013)
Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 200 6
C. Ende, Anouk Oordt-Speets, H. Vroling, H. Agt (2017)
Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40–49 years: A systematic reviewInternational Journal of Cancer, 141
C. Kuhl, Kevin Strobel, H. Bieling, C. Leutner, H. Schild, S. Schrading (2017)
Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.Radiology, 283 2
Jaime Geisel, M. Raghu, R. Hooley (2018)
The Role of Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening: The Case for and Against Ultrasound.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 39 1
M. Zuley, A. Bandos, M. Ganott, J. Sumkin, Amy Kelly, Victor Catullo, Grace Rathfon, Amy Lu, D. Gur (2013)
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.Radiology, 266 1
P. Skaane, A. Bandos, Randi Gullien, Ellen Eben, Ulrika Ekseth, U. Haakenaasen, Mina Izadi, I. Jebsen, Gunnar Jahr, Mona Krager, L. Niklason, S. Hofvind, D. Gur (2013)
Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.Radiology, 267 1
L. Tabár, G. Fagerberg, S. Duffy, N. Day (1989)
The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 43
N. Day, R. Warren (2000)
Mammographic screening and mammographic patternsBreast Cancer Research : BCR, 2
P. Carney, D. Miglioretti, B. Yankaskas, K. Kerlikowske, R. Rosenberg, C. Rutter, B. Geller, L. Abraham, S. Taplin, M. Dignan, G. Cutter, R. Ballard-Barbash (2003)
Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening MammographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 138
Karen Duncan, Gillian Needham, Fiona Gilbert, Heather Deans (1998)
Incident round cancers: what lessons can we learn?Clinical radiology, 53 1
Robin Shermis, R. Redfern, J. Burns, H. Kudrolli (2017)
Molecular Breast Imaging in Breast Cancer Screening and Problem Solving.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 37 5
M. Wallis, E. Moa, F. Zanca, K. Leifland, M. Danielsson (2012)
Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.Radiology, 262 3
E. Rafferty, M. Durand, E. Conant, D. Copit, S. Friedewald, D. Plecha, Dave Miller (2016)
Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.JAMA, 315 16
C. Kuhl (2017)
Abbreviated breast MRI for screening women with dense breast: the EA1141 trialThe British Journal of Radiology, 91
S. Poplack, T. Tosteson, C. Kogel, Helene Nagy (2007)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 189 3
S. Lee-Felker, L. Tekchandani, Mariam Thomas, Esha Gupta, D. Andrews-Tang, Antoinette Roth, J. Sayre, G. Rahbar (2017)
Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Extent of Disease.Radiology, 285 2
B. Plantes (1932)
Eine Neue Methode Zur Differenzierung in der Rontgenographie (Planigraphies)Acta Radiologica, 13
A. Tagliafico, M. Calabrese, G. Mariscotti, M. Durando, Simona Tosto, F. Monetti, S. Airaldi, B. Bignotti, J. Nori, Antonella Bagni, A. Signori, M. Sormani, N. Houssami (2016)
Adjunct Screening With Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in Women With Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 34 16
S. Ciatto, N. Houssami, D. Bernardi, F. Caumo, M. Pellegrini, S. Brunelli, P. Tuttobene, Paola Bricolo, C. Fantò, M. Valentini, S. Montemezzi, P. Macaskill (2013)
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.The Lancet. Oncology, 14 7
V. McCormack, I. Silva (2006)
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysisCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 15
Robert Smith, S. Duffy, R. Gabe, L. Tabár, A. Yen, T. Chen (2004)
The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?Radiologic clinics of North America, 42 5
Robin Shermis, Keith Wilson, Malcolm Doyle, Tamara Martin, Dawn Merryman, H. Kudrolli, R. Brenner (2016)
Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening With Molecular Breast Imaging for Women With Dense Breast Tissue.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 207 2
Juliet Morel, A. Iqbal, R. Wasan, C. Peacock, David Evans, R. Rahim, J. Goligher, M. Michell (2014)
The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography.Clinical radiology, 69 11
D. Gur, Gordon Abrams, D. Chough, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, R. Perrin, Grace Rathfon, J. Sumkin, M. Zuley, A. Bandos (2009)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 193 2
R. Brem (2017)
Invited Commentary on "Molecular Breast Imaging in Breast Cancer Screening and Problem Solving".Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 37 5
C. Hakim, D. Chough, M. Ganott, J. Sumkin, M. Zuley, D. Gur (2010)
Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 195 2
P. Crystal, S. Strano, Semyon Shcharynski, M. Koretz (2003)
Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 181 1
L. Tabár, L. Tabár, L. Tabár, A. Gad, A. Gad, A. Gad, L. Holmberg, L. Holmberg, L. Holmberg, U. Ljungquist, U. Ljungquist, U. Ljungquist, C. Fagerberg, C. Fagerberg, C. Fagerberg, L. Baldetorp, L. Baldetorp, L. Baldetorp, O. Gröntoft, O. Gröntoft, O. Gröntoft, B. Lundström, B. Lundström, B. Lundström, J. Månson, J. Månson, J. Månson, G. Eklund, G. Eklund, G. Eklund, N. Day, N. Day, N. Day, F. Pettersson, F. Pettersson, F. Pettersson (1985)
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and WelfareThe Lancet, 325
KathleenR. Brandt, D. Craig, Tanya Hoskins, T. Henrichsen, E. Bendel, Stephanie Brandt, J. Mandrekar (2013)
Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 200 2
Chen-Pin Chou, J. Lewin, Chia-Ling Chiang, Bao-Hui Hung, Tsung-Lung Yang, Jer-Shyung Huang, Jia-Bin Liao, H. Pan (2015)
Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.European journal of radiology, 84 12
N. Houssami (2017)
Evidence on Synthesized Two‐dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three‐dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer ScreeningClinical Breast Cancer, 18
E. Pisano, R. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, Janet Baum, S. Acharyya, Jean Cormack, Lucy Hanna, E. Conant, Laurie Fajardo, Lawrence Bassett, Carl D'Orsi, Roberta Jong, M. Rebner, A. Tosteson, Constantine Gatsonis (2008)
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.Radiology, 246 2
E. Miller, E. McCurry, B. Hruska (1971)
An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs.Radiology, 98 2
T. Svahn, N. Houssami, I. Sechopoulos, S. Mattsson (2015)
Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast, 24 2
E. Fallenberg, F. Schmitzberger, Heba Amer, B. Ingold‐Heppner, C. Balleyguier, F. Diekmann, F. Engelken, R. Mann, D. Renz, U. Bick, B. Hamm, C. Dromain (2017)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI – clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluationEuropean Radiology, 27
M. Noroozian, Lubomir Hadjiiski, S. Rahnama-Moghadam, Katherine Klein, D. Jeffries, Renee Pinsky, H. Chan, P. Carson, M. Helvie, M. Roubidoux (2012)
Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.Radiology, 262 1
W. Berg (2016)
Current Status of Supplemental Screening in Dense Breasts.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 34 16
S. Poplack (2017)
Breast Tomosynthesis: Clinical Evidence.Radiologic clinics of North America, 55 3
Brian Haas, V. Kalra, Jaime Geisel, M. Raghu, M. Durand, L. Philpotts (2013)
Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.Radiology, 269 3
N. Boyd, L. Martin, M. Yaffe, S. Minkin (2011)
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospectsBreast Cancer Research : BCR, 13
F. Mettler, A. Upton, C. Kelsey, R. Ashby, R. Rosenberg, M. Linver (1996)
Benefits versus risks from mammography: A critical reasessmentCancer, 77
V. Corsetti, N. Houssami, Aurora Ferrari, M. Ghirardi, S. Bellarosa, O. Angelini, C. Bani, P. Sardo, G. Remida, E. Galligioni, S. Ciatto (2008)
Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.European journal of cancer, 44 4
B. Plantes (1932)
EINE NEUE METHODE ZUR DIFFERENZIERUNG IN DER RÖNTGENOGRAPHIE (PLANIGRAPHIE)Acta Radiologica, os-13
E. McDonald, A. McCarthy, A. Akhtar, M. Synnestvedt, M. Schnall, E. Conant (2015)
Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 205 5
Mireille Aujero, S. Gavenonis, Ron Benjamin, Zugui Zhang, Jacqueline Holt (2017)
Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.Radiology, 283 1
S. Chiu, S. Duffy, A. Yen, L. Tabár, Robert Smith, Hsiu-Hsi Chen (2010)
Effect of Baseline Breast Density on Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage, Mortality, and Screening Parameters: 25-Year Follow-up of a Swedish Mammographic ScreeningCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 19
D. Rhodes, C. Hruska, A. Conners, Cindy Tortorelli, Robert Maxwell, Katie Jones, A. Toledano, M. O’Connor (2015)
Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 204 2
S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, G. Vijayaraghavan, D. Kopans (2015)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.Radiology, 277 3
M. Spangler, M. Zuley, J. Sumkin, G. Abrams, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, R. Perrin, D. Chough, R. Shah, D. Gur (2011)
Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 196 2
L. Partyka, Ana Lourenco, M. Mainiero (2014)
Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 203 1
C. Kuhl, S. Schrading, Kevin Strobel, H. Schild, R. Hilgers, H. Bieling (2014)
Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 32 22
R. Brem, Megan Lenihan, Jennifer Lieberman, J. Torrente (2015)
Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 204 2
L. Tabár, B. Viták, T. Chen, A. Yen, A. Cohen, T. Tot, S. Chiu, S. Chen, J. Fann, J. Rosell, H. Fohlin, Robert Smith, S. Duffy (2011)
Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.Radiology, 260 3
Ana Lourenco, Marilyn Barry-Brooks, G. Baird, Ashley Tuttle, M. Mainiero (2015)
Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis.Radiology, 274 2
A. McCarthy, D. Kontos, M. Synnestvedt, K. Tan, D. Heitjan, M. Schnall, E. Conant (2014)
Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106 11
Richard Sharpe, S. Venkataraman, Jordana Phillips, V. Dialani, Valerie Fein-Zachary, Seema Prakash, P. Slanetz, Tejas Mehta (2016)
Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.Radiology, 278 3
D. Kopans, S. Gavenonis, E. Halpern, Richard Moore (2011)
Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast TomosynthesisThe Breast Journal, 17
MD Berg, PhD Blume, PhD Cormack, PhD Mendelson, MD Lehrer, MD Bo¨hm-Ve´lez, MD Pisano, MD Jong, MD Evans, MD Morton, DO Mahoney, MD Larsen, MD Barr, P. Md, M. Md, MS Boparai (2008)
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.JAMA, 299 18
R. Hooley, M. Durand, L. Philpotts (2017)
Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 208 2
K. Lång, I. Andersson, A. Rosso, A. Tingberg, P. Timberg, S. Zackrisson (2015)
Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based studyEuropean Radiology, 26
A. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, F. Cavagnetto, Raffaella Rosasco, G. Rescinito, F. Monetti, M. Calabrese (2012)
One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesisEuropean Radiology, 22
W. Good, Gordon Abrams, Victor Catullo, D. Chough, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, D. Gur (2008)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 190 4
M. Durand, Brian Haas, Xiaopan Yao, Jaime Geisel, M. Raghu, R. Hooley, L. Horvath, L. Philpotts (2015)
Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.Radiology, 274 1
Julianne Greenberg, M. Javitt, Jason Katzen, S. Michael, A. Holland (2014)
Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 203 3
L. Tabár, G. Fagerberg, Hsiu-Hsi Chen, S. Duffy, C. Smart, A. Gad, Robert Smith (1995)
Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trialCancer, 75
Phoebe Freer, Bethany Niell, E. Rafferty (2015)
Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.Radiology, 275 2
D. Kopans (2014)
Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 202 2
Matthew Covington, V. Pizzitola, R. Lorans, B. Pockaj, D. Northfelt, Catherine Appleton, B. Patel (2017)
The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 210 2
Purpose of Review Advanced mammographic imaging modalities have been implemented in clinical practices throughout the USA. The most notable and widely used has been the three-dimensional derivative of digital mammography, known as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). In this article, we review the screening and diagnostic applications of DBT, along with its limita- tions. We also briefly address several supplemental breast imaging modalities. Recent Findings The accumulating evidence from both small and large-scale trials has shown a significant reduction in recall rates and slight increase in cancer detection rates when using DBT. However, the incremental increase in cancers detected remains less than that achieved with several supplemental imaging modalities, including whole-breast ultrasound, MRI, and MBI (molecular breast imaging). Other modalities, such as CEM (contrast-enhanced mammography) and CET (contrast-en- hanced tomography), are also being investigated. Summary Numerous studies have confirmed the added value of DBT and its increased cancer detection rate in both the screening and diagnostic settings. However, the superior sensitivity of supplemental imaging modalities renders them essential, especially in high-risk patients, and potentially those with dense breasts. . . . Keywords Breast cancer screening Digital breast tomosynthesis Whole-breast screening ultrasound Magnetic resonance imaging of breast Molecular breast imaging Abbreviations
Current Oncology Reports – Springer Journals
Published: May 29, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.