Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Lee (2010)
The functions and fortunes of English small towns at the close of the middle ages: evidence from John Leland's ItineraryUrban History, 37
R. Schmalensee (2000)
Antitrust Issues in Schumpeterian IndustriesThe American Economic Review, 90
J. Schumpeter (1943)
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
I. Krepchin (1993)
Eastman Kodak Co.Datamation archive, 39
Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, D. Robinson (2004)
The Market for Mergers and the Boundaries of the FirmS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
B. Klein, R. Crawford, A. Alchian (1978)
Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting ProcessThe Journal of Law and Economics, 21
Robin Lee (2013)
ONLINE APPENDIX: Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets
(2010)
Cognition and governance structure . Working paper . University of Rotterdam . Presented at workshop on valuation methods in agro - food and environmental economics , Barcelona , July 1 , 2010
Open internet order. FCC No. 10-201 (rel
R. Schmalensee, R. Willig (1989)
Handbook of Industrial Organization
(1993)
Technology diffusion: Tracing the flows of embodied R&D in eight OECD countries
James Cooper, Luke Froeb, Daniel O'Brien, M. Vita (2005)
Vertical Antitrust Policy as a Problem of InferenceAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
P. Newberne, G. Thurman (1981)
Working Group IV: lipids and the immune system. Report and recommendations.Cancer research, 41 9 Pt 2
S. Salop, D. Scheffman (1987)
Cost-Raising StrategiesJournal of Industrial Economics, 36
O. Hart, B. Holmstrom (2010)
A theory of firm scopeQuarterly Journal of Economics, 125
H. Varian (2001)
High-technology industries and market structure
D. Robinson (2006)
Strategic Alliances and the Boundaries of the FirmCorporate Finance: Governance
Patrick Anderson (2013)
The Nature of the Firm
C. Pratten (1980)
The Manufacture of PinsJournal of Economic Literature, 18
O. Hart, Bengt Holmström (2002)
A Theory of Firm ScopeCorporate Finance: Governance
(2008)
Inter-Firm contracts: Evidence. Forthcoming in Gibbons & Roberts (eds) Working Paper. Handbook of organizational economics
D. T. Robinson (2008)
Strategic alliances and the boundaries of the firmThe Review of Financial Studies, 21
(2004)
see Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko. United States Antitrust Modernization Commission
O. Williamson (1994)
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
Paolo Buccirossi (2008)
Handbook of Antitrust Economics, 1
Mark Lemley (2010)
Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for InnovationIntellectual Property Law eJournal
Giorgio Zanarone (2009)
Vertical Restraints and the Law: Evidence from Automobile FranchisingThe Journal of Law and Economics, 52
D. Burk, Mark Lemley (2009)
The Patent Crisis and How Courts Can Solve ItStanford Law School
Álvaro Bustos, Alexander Galetovic (2003)
Vertical Integration and Sabotage in Regulated IndustriesSocial Science Research Network
C. Jackson, H. Schneider (2010)
Do Social Connections Reduce Moral Hazard? Evidence from the New York City Taxi IndustryExperimental & Empirical Studies eJournal
W. Ouchi, O. Williamson (1977)
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
(1995)
Evaluating vertical mergers : A post - Chicago approach
P. Swan (1970)
Market Structure and Technological Progress: The Influence of Monopoly on Product InnovationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 84
R. Gibbons (2010)
Inside organizations: Pricing, politics, and path dependenceAnnual Review of Economics, 2
C. Yoo (2002)
Vertical Integration and Media Regulation in the New EconomyVanderbilt University Law School
Bengt Holmstrom, John Roberts (1998)
The Boundaries of the Firm RevisitedJournal of Economic Perspectives, 12
M. Rhodes-Kropf, D. T. Robinson (2008)
The market for mergers and the boundaries of the firmJournal of Finance, 63
(2010)
Innovation by entrants and incumbents. NBER working paper 16411
M. Riordan (2005)
Competitive effects of vertical integration
(1993)
Department of justice and federal trade commission: Horizontal Merger GuidelinesReview of Industrial Organization, 8
J. Baker (2007)
Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters InnovationAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
John Kwoka, L. White (1989)
The Antitrust Revolution
K. Arrow (1962)
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Álvaro Bustos, Alexander Galetovic (2007)
STANFORD CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Working Paper No . 316 Vertical Integration and Sabotage with a Regulated Bottleneck Monopoly
B. Lyons (1996)
Empirical relevance of efficient contract theory: inter-firm contractsOxford Review of Economic Policy, 12
Adelphia] In the matter of applications for consent to the assignment and/or transfer of control of licenses, MB Docket No. 05-192. Memorandum opinion and order
J. Ordover, Garth Saloner, S. Salop (2010)
Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure
(2002)
253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (en banc); Final Judgment No. 98-1232
An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 2 Vols., Everyman's library. London: Dent & Sons
H. Dutton, S.R.H. Jones (1983)
Invention and Innovation in the British Pin Industry, 1790–1850Business History Review, 57
(2002)
See United States v
(1962)
Chairman, Universities-National Bureau Committee for economic research, 1962. The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors
C. S. Yoo (2002)
Vertical integration and media regulation in the new economyYale Journal on Regulation, 19
R. Gibbons (2009)
Inside Organizations: Pricing, Politics, and Path DependenceCorporate Governance: Internal Governance
(2010)
Greasy pole economics
(2010)
Shooting blanks on wireless policy. Financial times FT.com
W. Poole (1987)
Monetary Policy Lessons of Recent Inflation and DisinflationPolitical Economy (Topic)
O. Holmes (1996)
The Path of the Law
(1988)
United States v. AT&T: The Economic Issues
O. Williamson (1996)
The mechanisms of governance
R. Schmalensee (1992)
Sunk Costs and Market Structure: A Review ArticleJournal of Industrial Economics, 40
F. Schuett (2010)
Network Neutrality: A Survey of the Economic LiteratureReview of Network Economics, 9
Ernie Englander (1987)
The inside contract system of production and organization: A neglected aspect of the history of the firmLabor History, 28
G. Stigler (1951)
The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the MarketJournal of Political Economy, 59
B. Owen (2007)
Antecedents to Net NeutralityInformation Systems & Economics
R. Schmalensee, David Evans (2001)
Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive IndustriesInnovation Policy and the Economy, 2
Francine Lafontaine, M. Slade (2008)
Exclusive contracts and vertical restraints : empirical evidence and public policy
Francine Lafontaine, M. Slade (2007)
Vertical integration and firm boundaries : the evidenceJournal of Economic Literature, 45
M. Salinger (1988)
Vertical Mergers and Market ForeclosureQuarterly Journal of Economics, 103
J. Buttrick (1952)
The Inside Contract SystemThe Journal of Economic History, 12
D. A. J. Goldfine, K. M. Vorrasi (2004)
The fall of the Kodak aftermarket doctrine: Dying a slow death in the lower courtsAntitrust Law Journal, 72
S. Peltzman (1991)
The Handbook of Industrial OrganizationJournal of Political Economy, 99
D. Teece (1992)
Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological ProgressJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18
S. Hill (2006)
Everyman's LibraryTimes literary supplement, TLS
Colin Camerer, Ulrike Malmendier (2011)
Behavioral economics and its applications
D. S. Evans, R. Schmalensee (2002)
Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competitive industries, In Innovation policy and the economy 2
(2010)
The struggle for what we already have
J. Sutton (1991)
Sunk Costs and Market Structure
R. Posner (2000)
Antitrust in the New EconomyAntitrust Law Journal, 68
Paolo Leon (1986)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismThe Antitrust Bulletin, 31
W. Fellner (1951)
The Influence of Market Structure on Technological ProgressQuarterly Journal of Economics, 65
(1992)
See Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services Inc
(1966)
Dissent in United States v. Von's Grocery. 384
A. Kahn (1988)
The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions
(1992)
Image technical services Inc., 504
Whether the firms that supply Internet hardware and software should face restrictions on the use of their property is an important and controversial policy issue. Advocates of “net neutrality”—including President Obama and the current FCC majority—believe that owners of broadband distribution systems (hardware used to distribute Internet and video services) and producers of certain “must-have” video content should be subject to prophylactic regulation that transcends present-day antitrust law enforcement. In the economic terms that are used in debates on competition policy, the concern is with vertical integration that may give firms both the opportunity (through denial of access or price discrimination) and incentive (increased profit) to restrict competition. This paper’s central point is that virtually every production process in the economy is vertically integrated, and economics predicts changes in the extent of vertical integration—that is, changes in the boundaries of the firm—in response to changes in relative prices, technology, or institutions. Both vertical integration and changes in the extent of vertical integration are benign characteristics of efficient, dynamic, competitive markets. While there is no shortage of theoretical models in which vertical integration may be harmful, most such models have restrictive assumptions and ambiguous welfare predictions—even when market power is assumed to be present. Empirical evidence that vertical integration or vertical restraints are harmful is weak, compared to evidence that vertical integration is beneficial—again, even in cases where market power appears to be present. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that prophylactic regulation is not necessary, and may well reduce welfare. Sound policy is to wait for ex post evidence of harm to justify interventions in specific cases. Net neutrality, recently enacted by the FCC but subject to judicial review, is an unfortunate idea.
Review of Industrial Organization – Springer Journals
Published: May 3, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.