Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Anisotropy of atmospheric delay in InSAR and its effect on InSAR atmospheric correction

Anisotropy of atmospheric delay in InSAR and its effect on InSAR atmospheric correction Reconstruction of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) atmospheric delay maps is important for the correction of tropospheric artifacts in differential InSAR (D-InSAR) and for the improvement in persistent scatterer (PS) target identification in PS-InSAR. In this study, we explored the spatial structure of atmospheric delay datasets and assessed its effect on InSAR atmospheric delay correction. Two-dimensional (2D) experimental variogram maps of turbulent mixing components derived from 12 GPS zenith wet delay (ZWD) datasets, 12 MERIS ZWD datasets, and 3 ERS-1/2 tandem interferograms showed that spatial anisotropy is common in these datasets. An anisotropic variogram model was then developed and applied to fit the experimental variograms. The results showed that the proposed 2D anisotropic variogram model is superior to the isotropic model, with average improvements in 31.92 and 33.57% in terms of root-mean-square error and correlation coefficients, respectively. With the proposed anisotropic variogram model, the atmospheric delay maps were reconstructed by kriging interpolation and used to correct the atmospheric artifacts in InSAR interferograms. The results showed that the model considering the anisotropy of atmospheric delay produces better results than that with the isotropy assumption. Finally, the effects of the anisotropy ratio, sampling density, and correlation distance of external water vapor data on the atmospheric delay correction were investigated. The results showed that when the anisotropy ratio is less than 0.3, or the sampling density is less than 1% or more than 60%, the impact of anisotropy on kriging prediction is not obvious. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Geodesy Springer Journals

Anisotropy of atmospheric delay in InSAR and its effect on InSAR atmospheric correction

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/anisotropy-of-atmospheric-delay-in-insar-and-its-effect-on-insar-LJJE30IC8L

References (57)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Earth Sciences; Geophysics/Geodesy; Earth Sciences, general
ISSN
0949-7714
eISSN
1432-1394
DOI
10.1007/s00190-018-1155-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reconstruction of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) atmospheric delay maps is important for the correction of tropospheric artifacts in differential InSAR (D-InSAR) and for the improvement in persistent scatterer (PS) target identification in PS-InSAR. In this study, we explored the spatial structure of atmospheric delay datasets and assessed its effect on InSAR atmospheric delay correction. Two-dimensional (2D) experimental variogram maps of turbulent mixing components derived from 12 GPS zenith wet delay (ZWD) datasets, 12 MERIS ZWD datasets, and 3 ERS-1/2 tandem interferograms showed that spatial anisotropy is common in these datasets. An anisotropic variogram model was then developed and applied to fit the experimental variograms. The results showed that the proposed 2D anisotropic variogram model is superior to the isotropic model, with average improvements in 31.92 and 33.57% in terms of root-mean-square error and correlation coefficients, respectively. With the proposed anisotropic variogram model, the atmospheric delay maps were reconstructed by kriging interpolation and used to correct the atmospheric artifacts in InSAR interferograms. The results showed that the model considering the anisotropy of atmospheric delay produces better results than that with the isotropy assumption. Finally, the effects of the anisotropy ratio, sampling density, and correlation distance of external water vapor data on the atmospheric delay correction were investigated. The results showed that when the anisotropy ratio is less than 0.3, or the sampling density is less than 1% or more than 60%, the impact of anisotropy on kriging prediction is not obvious.

Journal

Journal of GeodesySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 5, 2018

There are no references for this article.