Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kristopher Preacher, Derek Rucker, A. Hayes (2007)
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and PrescriptionsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 42
J. Jost, Aaron Kay (2005)
Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification.Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 3
L. Huddy (2004)
Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to Intergroup RelationsPolitical Psychology, 25
C. Sibley, Marc Wilson (2004)
Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female SubtypesSex Roles, 51
G. Viki, D. Abrams (2003)
Infra-humanization: Ambivalent sexism and the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to womenJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39
Andrew Christopher, Mark Wojda (2008)
Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Sexism, and Prejudice Toward Women in the WorkforcePsychology of Women Quarterly, 32
C. Sibley, N. Overall, J. Duckitt (2007)
When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist toward their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent SexismSex Roles, 57
I. Vine (1983)
Sociobiology and social psychology—Rivalry or symbiosis? The explanation of altruismBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 22
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
P. Glick, S. Fiske (1996)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70
Lyn Potaka (2008)
Comparability and Usability: Key issues in the design of internet forms for New Zealand’s 2006 Census of Populations and DwellingsSurvey research methods, 2
C. Sibley, N. Overall, J. Duckitt, Ryan Perry, T. Milfont, Sammyh Khan, R. Fischer, Andrew Robertson (2009)
Your Sexism Predicts My Sexism: Perceptions of Men’s (but not Women’s) Sexism Affects One’s Own Sexism Over TimeSex Roles, 60
P. Glick, Jeffrey Diebold, Barbara Bailey-Werner, Lin Zhu (1997)
The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward WomenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
C. Sibley, Marc Wilson, J. Duckitt (2007)
Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing AuthoritarianismPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33
M. Jackman (1994)
The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations
Peter Glick, S. Fiske, B. Adetoun, Annetje Brunner, Tineke Willemsen, K. Chipeta, B. Dardenne, A. Dijksterhuis, Miguel Moya, Hyun-Jeong Kim, M. Lameiras, Maria Sotelo, Angelica Mucchi-Faina, Myrna Romani, Nuray Sakalh, Bola Udegbe, Maria Ferreira, Wilson Lopez (2000)
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 5
B. O'Connor (2000)
SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP testBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32
L. Aiken, S. West (1991)
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
P. Glick, M. Lameiras, S. Fiske, T. Eckes, B. Masser, C. Volpato, A. Manganelli, J. Pek, Li-li Huang, Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu, Y. Castro, Maria Pereira, T. Willemsen, Annetje Brunner, Iris Six-Materna, R. Wells, P. Glick (2004)
Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 86 5
(2006)
2006 census of populations and dwellings
Stephen Kilianski, Laurie Rudman (1998)
Wanting It Both Ways: Do Women Approve of Benevolent Sexism?Sex Roles, 39
J. Sidanius, F. Pratto (1999)
Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
J. Jost, M. Banaji (1994)
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousnessBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 33
An Opposing Process Model outlining the pathways through which individual differences in Benevolent Sexism (BS) simultaneously enhance and attenuate support for gender equality of income and employment opportunity is presented. Results from a New Zealand electoral sample (N = 336) indicated that BS predicted Hostile Sexism (HS), and thus indirectly opposition toward gender-related policies (a hierarchy-enhancing effect). For women, BS also directly predicted attitudes toward gender equality in the opposing, supportive direction (a hierarchy-attenuating effect). Analyses of a 9-month longitudinal sample of undergraduate women substantiated these results (Study II; N = 170). In stable societies, the dual opposing effects of BS seem to form a system where hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating processes tend toward homeostasis or equilibrium within the population.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 11, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.