Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer_journal/an-analysis-of-recent-empirical-data-on-ought-implies-can-BWAGFgzh5E
References (17)
-
(2001)
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment -
Wesley Buckwalter, John Turri (2015)
Inability and Obligation in Moral JudgmentPLoS ONE, 10
-
M. Alicke (2000)
Culpable control and the psychology of blame.Psychological bulletin, 126 4
-
Moti Mizrahi (2015)
Ought, Can, and Presupposition: An Experimental Study, 4
-
H. Lawford-Smith, Miklos Kurthy (2015)
[Comment] A brief note on the ambiguity of ‘ought’. Reply to Moti Mizrahi’s ‘Ought, Can and Presupposition: An Experimental Study’., 4
-
Vladimir Chituc, P. Henne, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, F. Brigard (2016)
Blame, not ability, impacts moral “ought― judgments for impossible actions: Toward an empirical refutation of “ought― implies “can― -
H. Lawford-Smith, Miklos Kurthy (2015)
A Brief Note on the Ambiguity of Ought: Comment on Mizrahi's 'Ought, Can, and Presupposition: An Experimental Study', 4
-
(2016)
An empirical refutation of Boughtî mplies Bcan^ -
Moti Mizrahi (2015)
[Reply] Ought, Can, and Presupposition: A Reply to Kurthy and Lawford- Smith, 4
-
Jeanine Schroer, R. Schroer (2013)
Two Potential Problems with Philosophical Intuitions: Muddled Intuitions and Biased IntuitionsPhilosophia, 41
-
P. Vranas (2007)
I OUGHT, THEREFORE I CANPhilosophical Studies, 136
-
P. Graham (2011)
'Ought' and AbilityThe Philosophical Review, 120
-
Shaun Nichols, J. Knobe (2007)
Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk IntuitionsNoûs, 41
-
Shaun Nichols (2004)
Norms with Feeling -
Michael Hannon (2018)
Intuitions, reflective judgments, and experimental philosophySynthese, 195
-
C. Hancock (1999)
The Concept of Moral ObligationReview of Metaphysics, 52
-
Miklos Kurthy, H. Lawford-Smith, Paulo Sousa (2017)
Does ought imply can?PLoS ONE, 12
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Subject
- Philosophy; Philosophy, general; Epistemology; Ethics; Philosophy of Language; Philosophy of Mind; Philosophy of Science
- ISSN
- 0048-3893
- eISSN
- 1574-9274
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11406-017-9892-2
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Recent experimental studies dispute the position that commonsense morality accepts ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’ (OIC), the view that, necessarily, if an agent ought to perform some action, then she can perform that action. This paper considers and supports explanations for the results of these studies on the hypothesis that OIC is intuitive and true.
Journal
Philosophia – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 8, 2017