Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Chaudhury (1984)
Hindu-Muslim differential fertility: how much religious and how much socio?Social action, 34 3
(1995)
Census of India 1991: Religion
C. Goldscheider, P. Uhlenberg (1969)
Minority Group Status and FertilityAmerican Journal of Sociology, 74
P. Nangia, S. Kishor, Nair Ps, Devi Dr, Rajan Si (2001)
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) India 1998-99. Kerala.
(1995)
National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), xIndia 1992–93
W.D. Mosher, G.E. Hendershot (1984)
Religion and fertility: A replicationDemography, 21
J. Hobcraft, J. Mcdonald (1984)
Birth Intervals
(1995)
National Family Health Survey, Kerala, 1992–93
T. Fearn (1993)
17. Statistical Models for Causal AnalysisJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 158
Gavin Jones, D. Nortman (1968)
ROMAN CATHOLIC FERTILITY AND FAMILY PLANNING: A Comparative Review of the Research LiteratureStudies in Family Planning, 1
J. Chamie (1977)
Religious differentials in fertility: Lebanon, 1971.Population studies, 31 2
N. Ryder, C. Westoff (1971)
Reproduction in the United States, 1965
S. Goldstein (1970)
Religious fertility differentials in Thailand, 1960.Population studies, 24 3
A. Sibanda, Z. Woubalem, D. Hogan, D. Lindstrom (2003)
The proximate determinants of the decline to below-replacement fertility in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Studies in family planning, 34 1
B. Ramesh, S. Gulati, R. Retherford (1996)
Contraceptive use in India, 1992-93
(2000)
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99
M. Alagarajan (2000)
An analysis of fertility differentials by religion in Kerala state, India
R. Freedman, Whelpton Pk (1961)
Socio-economic factors in religious differentials in fertility.American Sociological Review, 26
C. Westoff, R. Potter (1963)
Third Child: A Study in the Prediction of Fertility
Kulkarni Pm, M. Alagarajan, M. Sivakami (1998)
Religious differentials in fertility in India: an assessment of the characteristics hypothesis.
B.M. Ramesh, S.C. Gulati, R.D. Retherford (1996)
National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, No. 2
In a revelation of overall decline to below replacement fertility in the Kerala state of India, it was generally found that fertility among Muslims is higher and contraceptive prevalence lower than among Hindus and Christians. This paper examines the interaction between religion and other socioeconomic factors, that is, whether the effect of religion on fertility remains constant across other factors. The analysis is based on the data from the National Family Health Survey-1 in Kerala. The analysis found that large Hindu-Muslim fertility differences at a low level of education do not persist at higher levels. For contraceptive use, wider gaps are found at a middle level of education and at a medium level of standard of living than at lower and higher levels. This indicates that couples at different socioeconomic settings make different decisions in spite of belonging to the same religion. The fact that fertility of Muslims at higher levels of socioeconomic status is low, and not much different than the fertility of other religions, suggests that the observed fertility gap between Hindus/Christians and Muslims is a passing phenomenon.
Population Research and Policy Review – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 17, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.