Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Forsyth, Michele Heiney, Sandra Wright (1997)
Biases in appraisals of women leaders.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1
V. Schein (1973)
The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics.The Journal of applied psychology, 57 2
S. Fiske, Shelley Taylor (1991)
Social cognition, 2nd ed.
DL Hamilton, JW Sherman (1994)
Handbook of social cognition (volume 2: Applications)
V. Schein, Ruediger Mueller (1992)
Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural lookJournal of Organizational Behavior, 13
D. Wegener, R. Petty (1995)
Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.Journal of personality and social psychology, 68 1
S. McKelvie, Kelly Waterhouse (2005)
Impressions of People with Gender-Ambiguous Male or Female First NamesPerceptual and Motor Skills, 101
J Prime, K Jonsen, N Carter, ML Maznevski (2008)
Managers’ perceptions of women and men leaders: A cross cultural comparisonInternational Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8
B. Ragins, B. Townsend, M. Mattis (1998)
Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceilingAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
JK Swim, LL Cohen (1997)
Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes towards women and modern sexism scalesPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
R. Merritt, C. Kok (1995)
Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesisSex Roles, 33
LR Goldberg (1999)
Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7
M. Heilman, Caryn Block, R. Martell, Michael Simon (1989)
Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
J. Bermúdez, de Raad, J. Vries, A. Pérez-García, A. Sanchez-Elvita, G. Heck (1997)
Personality Psychology in Europe, 7
M. Shaffer, J. Joplin, M. Bell, T. Lau, C. Oguz (2000)
Gender discrimination and job-related outcomes: a cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57
ME Heilman, AS Wallen, D Fuchs, MM Tamkins (2004)
Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male tasksThe Journal of Applied Psychology, 89
Emily Duehr, J. Bono (2006)
MEN, WOMEN, AND MANAGERS: ARE STEREOTYPES FINALLY CHANGING?Personnel Psychology, 59
I. Jawahar, Jonny Mattsson (2005)
Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 3
M. Hebl, E. King, P. Glick, S. Singletary, Stephanie Kazama (2007)
Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 6
J. Twenge (1997)
Attitudes Toward Women, 1970–1995Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21
C. Stangor, Laure Lynch, Changming Duan, Beth Glas (1992)
Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62
A. Eagly, S. Chaiken (1993)
The psychology of attitudes.Journal of Marketing Research, 34
M. Heilman (2001)
Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder.Journal of Social Issues, 57
RH Fazio (1990)
Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 23
M. Heilman, A. Wallen, D. Fuchs, Melinda Tamkins (2004)
Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 3
R. Fazio (1990)
Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative FrameworkAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23
V. Schein, Ruediger Mueller, Terri Lituchy, Jiang Liu (1996)
Think manager—think male: a global phenomenon?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17
Laurie Rudman, P. Glick (2001)
Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic WomenJournal of Social Issues, 57
John Robinson, P. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (1991)
Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes
J. Swim, L. Cohen (1997)
Overt, Covert, And Subtle SexismPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
R. Fazio, M. Olson (2007)
Attitudes: Foundations, Functions, and Consequences
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt (2001)
The Leadership Styles of Women and MenJournal of Social Issues, 57
ST Fiske, SE Taylor (1991)
Social cognition
R. Martell, C. Parker, Cynthia Emrich, M. Crawford (1998)
Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: "Much ado about something."Journal of Social Behavior and Personality
P. Glick, S. Fiske (1996)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70
JM Twenge (1997)
Attitudes toward women, 1970–1995: A meta-analysisPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
J. Swim, Lauri Hyers, L. Cohen, M. Ferguson (2001)
Everyday Sexism: Evidence for Its Incidence, Nature, and Psychological Impact From Three Daily Diary StudiesJournal of Social Issues, 57
Linda Carli (2001)
Gender and Social InfluenceJournal of Social Issues, 57
P. Glick, Sadie Larsen, C. Johnson, Heather Branstiter (2005)
Evaluations of Sexy Women In Low- and High-Status JobsPsychology of Women Quarterly, 29
B. Masser, D. Abrams (2004)
Reinforcing the Glass Ceiling: The Consequences of Hostile Sexism for Female Managerial CandidatesSex Roles, 51
T. Wilson, S. Lindsey, T. Schooler (2000)
A model of dual attitudes.Psychological review, 107 1
D. Paulhus (1991)
Measurement and control of response bias.
H. Davison, M. Burke (2000)
Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic InvestigationJournal of Vocational Behavior, 56
S. Fiske, D. Bersoff, E. Borgida, K. Deaux, M. Heilman (1991)
Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins..American Psychologist, 46
Jessica Wilson (2011)
Much Ado About ‘Something’Analysis, 71
M. Heilman, T. Okimoto (2007)
Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 1
Jeanine Prime, Karsten Jonsen, N. Carter, M. Maznevski (2008)
Managers' Perceptions of Women and Men LeadersInternational Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8
J. Terborg (1977)
Women in management: A research review.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62
L. Garcia-Marques, D. MacKie (1999)
The impact of stereotype-incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change.Journal of personality and social psychology, 77 5
S. Fiske (1993)
Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping.The American psychologist, 48 6
Peter Glick, S. Fiske (2001)
An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.The American psychologist, 56 2
Amy Cuddy, S. Fiske, P. Glick (2004)
When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the IceJournal of Social Issues, 60
M. Hogg, J. Cooper (2003)
The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology
L. Huddy, F. Neely, M. Lafay (2000)
The polls--trends : support for the women's movement.Public opinion quarterly, 64 3
M. Nisbet, Teresa Myers (2007)
The Polls—Trends Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global WarmingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 71
Carra Sims, F. Drasgow, L. Fitzgerald (2005)
The effects of sexual harassment on turnover in the military: time-dependent modeling.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 6
Amy Conn, P. Hanges, William Sipe, A. Salvaggio (1999)
The Search for Ambivalent Sexism: a Comparison of Two MeasuresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 59
A. Diekman, A. Eagly (2000)
Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and FuturePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26
R. Lord, Roseanne Foti, C. Vader (1984)
A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34
The purpose of the current research was to evaluate how gender stereotypes and sexist attitudes affect responses to hypothetical job applicants. In Study 1 (N = 93) undergraduate and graduate students in the Southwestern USA evaluated a male, female, or gender-ambiguous resume. They also completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI; Glick and Fiske 1996). Hypotheses were tested using ANOVA. Results suggested that participants who expressed more hostile sexist attitudes evaluated the gender-ambiguous applicant more negatively than a male or female applicant. In Study 2 (N = 117), graduate and undergraduate participants were asked to indicate the gender of the ambiguous applicant. Those who scored high on hostile sexism, and perceived a gender-ambiguous applicant to be male, provided the most favorable evaluations.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 23, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.