Algorithms in plastic surgery—expansive or restrictive?

Algorithms in plastic surgery—expansive or restrictive? Eur J Plast Surg (2014) 37:515–516 DOI 10.1007/s00238-014-0973-1 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Shehab Jabir Received: 28 April 2014 /Accepted: 24 May 2014 /Published online: 7 June 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Sir, The utility of an algorithm or its lack thereof is dependent Plastic surgery has always been a speciality which has thrived upon the algorithm itself and the extent of “prescriptive” on innovations in reconstruction following the application of terminology/dimensions employed within it by its inceptors. independent thinking by the reconstructive surgeon. A defect The more prescriptive the suggestions within an algorithm, the may be reconstructed via selection, from an armamentarium, greater the curtailment in reconstructive freedom therein. Algorithms that focus on providing general principles of of one of a wide variety of available methods, or the surgeon may in fact develop his own unique method to reconstruct the reconstruction of tissue deficits sustained in various ways particular defect in question. This method of reconstruction (for example, cancer extirpation or traumatic tissue loss) in may be a completely new technique, dependent on the skill different anatomical locations appear to provide more freedom and mastery of the surgeon involved, which had not been in terms of the choice of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Algorithms in plastic surgery—expansive or restrictive?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/algorithms-in-plastic-surgery-expansive-or-restrictive-WXHZzfFkAX
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-014-0973-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2014) 37:515–516 DOI 10.1007/s00238-014-0973-1 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Shehab Jabir Received: 28 April 2014 /Accepted: 24 May 2014 /Published online: 7 June 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Sir, The utility of an algorithm or its lack thereof is dependent Plastic surgery has always been a speciality which has thrived upon the algorithm itself and the extent of “prescriptive” on innovations in reconstruction following the application of terminology/dimensions employed within it by its inceptors. independent thinking by the reconstructive surgeon. A defect The more prescriptive the suggestions within an algorithm, the may be reconstructed via selection, from an armamentarium, greater the curtailment in reconstructive freedom therein. Algorithms that focus on providing general principles of of one of a wide variety of available methods, or the surgeon may in fact develop his own unique method to reconstruct the reconstruction of tissue deficits sustained in various ways particular defect in question. This method of reconstruction (for example, cancer extirpation or traumatic tissue loss) in may be a completely new technique, dependent on the skill different anatomical locations appear to provide more freedom and mastery of the surgeon involved, which had not been in terms of the choice of

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2014

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off