Agreement between clinician-rated versus patient-reported outcomes in Huntington disease

Agreement between clinician-rated versus patient-reported outcomes in Huntington disease Background Clinician-rated measures of functioning are often used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and other behavio- ral research in Huntington disease. As study costs for clinician-rated assessments are not always feasible, there is a question of whether patient self-report of commonly used clinician-rated measures may serve as acceptable alternatives in low risk behavioral trials. Aim The purpose of this paper was to determine the level of agreement between self-report and clinician-ratings of com- monly used functional assessment measures in Huntington disease. Design 486 participants with premanifest or manifest Huntington disease were examined. Total Functional Capacity, Func- tional Assessment, and Independence Scale assessments from the Unified Huntington Disease Rating scale were completed by clinicians; a self-report version was also completed by individuals with Huntington disease. Cronbach’s α was used to examine internal consistency, one-way analysis of variance was used to examine group differences, and paired t tests, kappa agreement coefficients, and intra-class correlations were calculated to determine agreement between raters. Results Internal consistency for self-reported ratings of functional capacity and ability were good. There were significant differences between those with premanifest, early-, and late-stage disease; those with later-stage disease reported less abil - ity and independence than the other http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Neurology Springer Journals

Agreement between clinician-rated versus patient-reported outcomes in Huntington disease

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/agreement-between-clinician-rated-versus-patient-reported-outcomes-in-JeE8x9MlyN
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Neurology; Neurosciences; Neuroradiology
ISSN
0340-5354
eISSN
1432-1459
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00415-018-8852-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background Clinician-rated measures of functioning are often used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and other behavio- ral research in Huntington disease. As study costs for clinician-rated assessments are not always feasible, there is a question of whether patient self-report of commonly used clinician-rated measures may serve as acceptable alternatives in low risk behavioral trials. Aim The purpose of this paper was to determine the level of agreement between self-report and clinician-ratings of com- monly used functional assessment measures in Huntington disease. Design 486 participants with premanifest or manifest Huntington disease were examined. Total Functional Capacity, Func- tional Assessment, and Independence Scale assessments from the Unified Huntington Disease Rating scale were completed by clinicians; a self-report version was also completed by individuals with Huntington disease. Cronbach’s α was used to examine internal consistency, one-way analysis of variance was used to examine group differences, and paired t tests, kappa agreement coefficients, and intra-class correlations were calculated to determine agreement between raters. Results Internal consistency for self-reported ratings of functional capacity and ability were good. There were significant differences between those with premanifest, early-, and late-stage disease; those with later-stage disease reported less abil - ity and independence than the other

Journal

Journal of NeurologySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 23, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off