Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Jones-Lee, B. Loasby (1977)
Choice, Complexity and Ignorance.Economica, 44
P. Kitcher (1990)
The Division of Cognitive LaborThe Journal of Philosophy, 87
J. Beebe, Wesley Buckwalter (2010)
The Epistemic Side-Effect EffectMind & Language, 25
R. Rosenthal (1978)
How often are our numbers wrongAmerican Psychologist, 33
H. Simon (1970)
The Sciences of the Artificial
D. Colander (2009)
Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and the European CVAR Approach to MacroeconometricsEconomics, 3
Paul Milgrom, John Roberts (1985)
Relying on the Information of Interested PartiesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 17
T. McQuade, William Butos (2003)
Order-Dependent Knowledge and the Economics of ScienceThe Review of Austrian Economics, 16
C. Prendergast (1986)
Alfred Schutz and the Austrian School of EconomicsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 92
J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (1992)
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
B Latour, S Woolgar (1979)
Laboratory life
A. Schutz (1970)
Phenomenology and the Foundations of the Social Sciences
S Bikhchandani, D Hirshleifer, I Welch (1992)
A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascadesJournal of Political Economy, 100
R. Koppl, Robert Kurzban, L. Kobilinsky (2008)
Epistemics for ForensicsEpisteme, 5
I. Lakatos (1976)
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
A. Goldman (1967)
A Causal Theory of KnowingThe Journal of Philosophy, 64
A Schutz (1967)
the phenomenology of the social world, translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert
J. Knobe (2003)
Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigationPhilosophical Psychology, 16
Sendil Ethiraj, Daniel Levinthal (2002)
Modularity and Innovation in Complex SystemsIO: Productivity
F. Hayek, Peter Boettke (1935)
Collectivist Economic Planning
N. Rescher, A. Michalos (1977)
Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science
C. Lütge (1998)
Naturalized Philosophy of Science and Economic Method
Joshua May, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, J. Hull, A. Zimmerman (2008)
Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: an Empirical StudyReview of Philosophy and Psychology, 1
S Fuller (1988)
Social epistemology
R. Koppl (2005)
How to Improve Forensic ScienceEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 20
James Carrier, D. Bloor (1977)
Knowledge and Social ImageryBritish Journal of Sociology, 28
Philip Mirowski, E. Sent (2002)
Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science
P. Simons, J. Mohanty (1984)
Husserl and Frege.The Philosophical Quarterly, 34
F Machlup (1980)
An interview with Professor MachlupAustrian Economics Newsletter, 3
A. Schutz (1962)
On Multiple RealitiesThe Russian Sociological Review, 3
Roderick Chisholm (1989)
Theory of Knowledge
I. Lakatos, E. Zahar (1977)
On the Uses of Rigorous Proof. (Book Reviews: Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery)Science
A. Goldman (1999)
Knowledge in a Social World
RJ Aumann (1976)
Agreeing to disagreeAnnals of Statistics, 4
M. Polanyi (1962)
The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic TheoryMinerva, 38
R. Gutman, B. Barber (1953)
Science and the Social OrderBritish Journal of Sociology, 4
J. Beebe, Mark Jensen (2012)
Surprising connections between knowledge and action: The robustness of the epistemic side-effect effectPhilosophical Psychology, 25
Janet Walker (2006)
Agreeing to disagree.Nature cell biology, 8 8
T. Broadbent, I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (1972)
Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgeThe Mathematical Gazette, 56
AM Diamond (2008)
The new Palgrave dictionary of economics
I Lakatos (1976)
Proofs and refutations: the logic of mathematical discovery
F. D’Agostino (2009)
From the organization to the division of cognitive laborPolitics, Philosophy & Economics, 8
George Akerlof (1970)
The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismQuarterly Journal of Economics, 84
R. Rosenthal (1968)
Experimenter effects in behavioral research
I Kant (1934)
Critique of pure reason
G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd (1999)
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
WVO Quine (1969)
“Epistemology Naturalized”, in ontological relativity and other essays
Adam Feltz, Chris Zarpentine (2010)
Do you know more when it matters less?Philosophical Psychology, 23
A Goldman (2009)
Supplement to royal institute of philosophy, 2006/2007 lecture series on epistemology
B Loasby (1976)
Choice
G. Tullock, D. Montgomery (1967)
The Organization Of Inquiry
Constance Ballantine, Otto Neurath, Niels Bohr, J. Dewey, Bertrand Russell, Rudolf Carnap, Charles Morris (1939)
INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNIFIED SCIENCE.Science, 86 2235
L. Marengo, G. Dosi (2005)
Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solvingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58
Thomas Leonard (2002)
Reflection on rules in science: an invisible-hand perspectiveJournal of Economic Methodology, 9
F. Winden (1997)
Experimental Studies Of Signaling Games
J. Launie, Luigi Luini (2000)
Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and ExperimentsJournal of Risk and Insurance, 67
P. Kitcher (1992)
The Naturalists ReturnThe Philosophical Review, 101
T. Gendler, J. Hawthorne (2005)
Oxford Studies in Epistemology
G. Stigler (1976)
Do Economists MatterSouthern Economic Journal, 42
W. Quine (1969)
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays
A. Goldman (1978)
Epistemics: The Regulative Theory of CognitionThe Journal of Philosophy, 75
Bruno Latour (1989)
Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through societyContemporary Sociology, 18
EL Gettier (1963)
Is justified true belief knowledge?Analysis, 23
S. Asch (1951)
Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments
RK Merton (1957)
“Science and the Social Order”, in his Social Theory and Social Structure, revised and enlarged edition
G. Frege, J. Austin (1951)
The foundations of arithmetic : a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of numberThe Journal of Philosophy, 48
J. Weinberg, Shaun Nichols, S. Stich (2001)
Normativity and Epistemic IntuitionsPhilosophical Topics, 29
Simon Cullen (2010)
Survey-Driven RomanticismReview of Philosophy and Psychology, 1
L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (1994)
Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible handThe American Economic Review, 84
James Fieser, B. Dowden (2011)
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Vivien Burr (1995)
An introduction to social constructionism
W. Brock, S. Durlauf (1999)
A formal model of theory choice in scienceEconomic Theory, 14
A. DiamondJr. (1988)
Science as a rational enterpriseTheory and Decision, 24
Paul join, H. Guetzkow, W. White (1952)
Groups, Leadership, and Men, 13
J. Wible (1998)
The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered
C. Prendergast (2001)
By Way of Deduction: Schütz's Essay on TaxationThe Review of Austrian Economics, 14
J. Schaffer, J. Knobe (2012)
Contrastive Knowledge SurveyedNoûs, 46
A. Diamond (2008)
Economics of Science, 7
A. Goldman (2009)
Social Epistemology: Theory and ApplicationsRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 64
D. Hands (2002)
The Sociology Of Scientific Knowledge: Some Thoughts On The Possibilities
Ronald Santoni, M. Grene (1971)
Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 32
G Tullock (2005)
Selected works of Gordon Tullock
Sushil Bikhchandani, David Hirshleifer, Ivo Welch (2007)
You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades
D. Levy, S. Peart (2010)
Tullock on motivated inquiry: expert-induced uncertainty disguised as riskPublic Choice, 152
I. Lakatos, J. Worrall, E. Zahar (1976)
Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter
Peter Berger (1966)
The Social Construction of Reality
Frederick Schmitt (1994)
Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge
K. Mannheim, L. Wirth (1938)
Ideology and utopia : an introduction to the sociology of knowledgeThe American Historical Review, 43
Garnett and Boettke both seek to identify the appropriate behavior for the representative scientist. The social structure of science is better represented, however, with a heterogeneous agent model. Social epistemology and epistemological naturalism provide context for the argument against representative agent methodology. Asking whether individual scientists should “commit themselves to an approach and pursue it doggedly” or make “a professional commitment to intellectual tolerance, openness, and broad-mindedness” is like asking whether it is better to be a bouncer or a bookkeeper. The question depends on particulars that vary from person to person. Down with representative agent methodology. Up with diversity.
The Review of Austrian Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 9, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.