Accounting for expected linkage in biometric analysis of quantitative traits

Accounting for expected linkage in biometric analysis of quantitative traits The problem of accounting for a genetic estimation of expected linkage in the disposition of random loci was solved for the additive-dominant model. The Comstock–Robinson estimations for the sum of squares of dominant effects, the sum of squares of additive effects, and the average degree of dominance were modified. Also, the Wright’s estimation for the number of loci controlling the variation of a quantitative trait was modified and its application sphere was extended. Formulas that should eliminate linkage, on average, were derived for these estimations. Nonbiased estimations were applied to the analysis of maize data. Our result showed that the most likely cause of heterosis is dominance rather than overdominance and that the main part of the heterotic effect is provided by dozens of genes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian Journal of Genetics Springer Journals

Accounting for expected linkage in biometric analysis of quantitative traits

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/accounting-for-expected-linkage-in-biometric-analysis-of-quantitative-I8wN4i9VeL
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Pleiades Publishing, Inc.
Subject
Biomedicine; Human Genetics; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Microbial Genetics and Genomics
ISSN
1022-7954
eISSN
1608-3369
D.O.I.
10.1134/S1022795415060113
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The problem of accounting for a genetic estimation of expected linkage in the disposition of random loci was solved for the additive-dominant model. The Comstock–Robinson estimations for the sum of squares of dominant effects, the sum of squares of additive effects, and the average degree of dominance were modified. Also, the Wright’s estimation for the number of loci controlling the variation of a quantitative trait was modified and its application sphere was extended. Formulas that should eliminate linkage, on average, were derived for these estimations. Nonbiased estimations were applied to the analysis of maize data. Our result showed that the most likely cause of heterosis is dominance rather than overdominance and that the main part of the heterotic effect is provided by dozens of genes.

Journal

Russian Journal of GeneticsSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 21, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off