Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Vervaecke, H. Vries, L. Elsacker (1999)
AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE CONSISTENCY OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY AND AGONISTIC DOMINANCE IN DIFFERENT SOCIAL CONTEXTS IN CAPTIVE BONOBOSJournal of Immunology
D. Kenny, W. Nasby (1980)
Splitting the reciprocity correlation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38
A. Väänänen, B. Buunk, M. Kivimäki, J. Pentti, J. Vahtera (2005)
When it is better to give than to receive: long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange.Journal of personality and social psychology, 89 2
E. Adams (2005)
Bayesian analysis of linear dominance hierarchiesAnimal Behaviour, 69
David Miller, James Byrnes (1997)
The role of contextual and personal factors in children's risk taking.Developmental psychology, 33 5
H. Vries (1998)
Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and reviewAnimal Behaviour, 55
R. Boyd, J. Silk (1983)
A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranksAnimal Behaviour, 31
B. Manly (1997)
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
E. Forsyth, L. Katz (1946)
A Matrix Approach to the Analysis of Sociometric Data: Preliminary Report, 9
T. Malloy, L. Albright (2001)
Multiple and Single Interaction Dyadic Research Designs: Conceptual and Analytic IssuesBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 23
B. Whitley, J. Schofield, H. Snyder (1984)
Peer preferences in a desegregated school: a round robin analysis.Journal of personality and social psychology, 46 4
Scott Smith (1990)
Book Review: Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An IntroductionJournal of Marketing Research, 27
E.W. Noreen (1989)
Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses: an introduction
M. Appleby (1983)
The probability of linearity in hierarchiesAnimal Behaviour, 31
D. Kenny, D. Kashy, W. Cook (2006)
Dyadic Data Analysis
H. Landau (1951)
On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristicsBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 13
A. Rapoport (1949)
Outline of a probabilistic approach to animal sociology.The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 11 3
N. Howe, H. Recchia (2005)
Playmates and teachers: reciprocal and complementary interactions between siblings.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 19 4
Guillermo Dabos, D. Rousseau (2004)
Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
J.A.R.A.M. Hooff, J.A.B. Wensing (1987)
Man and Wolf
D. Leiva, A. Solanas, Lluís Salafranca (2008)
Testing reciprocity in social interactions: A comparison between the directional consistency and skew-symmetry statisticsBehavior Research Methods, 40
David Kenny, Tessa West, Antonius Cillessen, John Coie, Kenneth Dodge, Julie Hubbard, D. Schwartz (2007)
Accuracy in Judgments of AggressivenessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33
R. Warner, D. Kenny, M. Stoto (1979)
A New Round Robin Analysis of Variance for Social Interaction DataJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
Jersey Liang, N. Krause, J. Bennett (2001)
Social exchange and well-being: is giving better than receiving?Psychology and aging, 16 3
D.A. Kenny, T.V. West, A.H.N. Cillessen, J.D. Coie, K.A. Dodge, J.A. Hubbard (2007)
Accuracy in the judgment of aggressivenessPers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 33
A. Solanas, Lluís Salafranca, Carles Riba, V. Sierra, D. Leiva (2006)
Quantifying social asymmetric structuresBehavior Research Methods, 38
P. Onghena, R. May (1995)
Pitfalls in computing and interpreting randomization testp values: A commentary on Chen and DunlapBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27
J. Tufto, E. Solberg, T. Ringsby (1998)
Statistical models of transitive and intransitive dominance structuresAnimal Behaviour, 55
J. Moreno, H. Jennings (2007)
Who Shall Survive
H. Vries (1995)
An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationshipsAnimal Behaviour, 50
C. Hemelrijk (1990)
A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group levelJournal of Theoretical Biology, 143
C. Hemelrijk (1990)
Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group levelAnimal Behaviour, 39
This paper examines statistical analysis of social reciprocity, that is, the balance between addressing and receiving behaviour in social interactions. Specifically, it focuses on the measurement of social reciprocity by means of directionality and skew-symmetry statistics at different levels. Two statistics have been used as overall measures of social reciprocity at group level: the directional consistency and the skew-symmetry statistics. Furthermore, the skew-symmetry statistic allows social researchers to obtain complementary information at dyadic and individual levels. However, having computed these measures, social researchers may be interested in testing statistical hypotheses regarding social reciprocity. For this reason, it has been developed a statistical procedure, based on Monte Carlo sampling, in order to allow social researchers to describe groups and make statistical decisions.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 2, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.