Due to large inter- and intra-patient variabilities of arterial input functions (AIFs), accurately modeling and using patient-specific AIF are very important for quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Computer simulations were performed to evaluate and compare nine population AIF models with the Parker AIF used as ‘gold standard’. The Parker AIF was calculated with a temporal resolution of 1.5 s, and then the other nine AIF models were used to fit the Parker AIF. A total of 100 randomly generated volume transfer constants (Ktrans) and distribution volumes (ve) were used to calculate the contrast agent concentration curves based on the Parker AIF and the extended Tofts model with blood plasma volume (vp) = 0.0, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10. Subsequently, nine AIF models were used to fit these curves to extract physiological parameters (Ktrans, ve and vp). The agreements between generated and extracted Ktrans and ve values were evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis. The effects of the second pass of the Parker AIF model with and without adding Rician noise on extracted physiological parameters were evaluated by 1000 simulations using one of the nine mathematical AIF models closest to the Parker model with the smallest number of parameters. The results demonstrated that a six-parameter linear function plus bi-exponential function AIF model was almost equivalent to the Parker AIF and that the corresponding generated and extracted Ktrans and ve were in excellent agreements. The effects of the second pass of contrast agent circulation were small on extracted physiological parameters using the extended Tofts model, unless noise was added with signal to noise ratio less than 10 dB.
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 23, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud