Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
CW Dawson, NJ Mount, RJ Abrahart, J Louis (2013)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison, validation and physical legitimacy of neural network-based hydrological modelsJ Hydroinform, 222
P Krause, DP Boyle, F Bäse (2005)
Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessmentAdv Geosci, 5
GJ Bowden, GC Dandy, HR Maier (2005)
Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodologyJ Hydrol, 301
L Kanal (1974)
Patterns in pattern recognitionIEEE Trans Inf Theory, 20
KT Lee, WC Hung, CC Meng (2008)
Deterministic insight into ANN model performance for storm runoff simulationWater Resour Manag, 22
RJ May, GC Dandy, HR Maier, JB Nixon (2008)
Application of partial mutual information variable selection to ANN forecasting of water quality in water distribution systemsEnviron Model Softw, 23
MK Tiwari, K-Y Song, C Chatterjee, MM Gupta (2012)
Improving reliability of river flow forecasting using neural networks, wavelets and self-organising mapsJ Hydroinform, 130
S Soroosh, M Arash (2012)
A novel hybrid mechanistic-data-driven model identification framework using NSGA-IIJ Hydroinform, 026
CW Dawson, LM See, RJ Abrahart, AJ Heppenstall (2006)
Symbiotic adaptive neuron-evolution applied to rainfall–runoff modelling in northern EnglandNeural Netw, 19
G Panchal, A Ganatra, YP Kosta (2010)
Searching most efficient neural network architecture using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC)Int J Comput Appl, 1
N Seckin (2010)
Modeling flood discharge at ungauged sites across Turkey using neuro-fuzzy and neural networksJ Hydroinform, 046
ARS Kumar, KP Sudheer, SK Jain, PK Agarwal (2005)
Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network typesHydrol Process, 19
A Sharma (2000)
Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: part 1—a strategy for system predictor identificationJ Hydrol, 239
HCL Chua, TSW Wong, LK Sriramula (2008)
Comparison between kinematic wave and artificial neural network models in event-based runoff simulation for an overland planeJ Hydrol, 357
Z Li, G Kan, C Yao, Z Liu, Q Li, S Yu (2014)
An improved neural network model and its application in hydrological simulationJ Hydrol Eng, 19
M Karlsson, S Yakowitz (1987)
Nearest neighbour methods for non-parametric rainfall runoff forecastingWater Resour Res, 23
H Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Trans Autom Control, 19
GJ Bowden, HR Maier, GC Dandy (2005)
Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 2. Case study: forecasting salinity in a riverJ Hydrol, 301
N Srinivas, K Deb (1994)
Multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithmsEvol Comput, 2
G Kan, C Yao, Q Li, Z Li, Z Yu, Z Liu, L Ding, X He, K Liang (2015)
Improving event-based rainfall–runoff simulation using an ensemble artificial neural network based hybrid data-driven modelStoch Environ Res Risk Assess
S Ding, C Su, J Yu (2011)
An optimizing BP neural network algorithm based on genetic algorithmArtif Intell Rev, 36
Z Zhao, Y Zhang, H Liao (2008)
Design of ensemble neural network using the Akaike information criterionEng Appl Artif Intell, 21
Q Ju, Z Yu, Z Hao, G Ou, J Zhao, D Liu (2009)
Division-based rainfall–runoff simulations with BP neural networks and Xinanjiang modelNeurocomputing, 72
K Deb, AM IEEE, A Pratap, S Agarwal, T Meyarivan (2002)
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-IIIEEE Trans Evol Comput, 6
A Sharma (2000)
Seasonal to interannual rainfall probabilistic forecasts for improved water supply management: part 3—a nonparametric probabilistic forecast modelJ Hydrol, 239
AP Piotrowski, JJ Napiorkowski (2013)
A comparison of methods to avoid overfitting in neural networks training in the case of catchment runoff modelingJ Hydrol, 476
K Deb (2001)
Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms
AW Minns, MJ Hall (1996)
Artificial neural networks as rainfall–runoff modelsHydrol Sci J, 41
D Zhang, K Cai (2003)
A genetic-algorithm-based two-stage learning scheme for neural networksJ Syst Sin, 15
P Sollich, A Krogh (1996)
Advances in neural information processing systems
J He, G Valeo, A Chu, Norman F Neumann (2011)
Prediction of event-based stormwater runoff quantity and quality by ANNs developed using PMI-based input selectionJ Hydrol, 400
S Wei, D Zuo, J Song (2012)
Improving prediction accuracy of river discharge time series using a Wavelet-NAR artificial neural networkJ Hydroinform, 143
A Jain, SKVP Indurthy (2003)
Comparative analysis of event-based rainfall–runoff modeling techniques—deterministic, statistical and artificial neural networksJ Hydrol Eng, 8
Y Chiang, L Chang, F Chang (2004)
Comparison of static-feedforward and dynamic feedback neural networks for rainfall–runoff modelingJ Hydrol, 290
DJ Karran, E Morin, J Adamowski (2013)
Multi-step streamflow forecasting using data-driven non-linear methods in contrasting climate regimesJ Hydroinform, 042
AS Tokar, M Markus (2000)
Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural networks and conceptual modelsJ Hydrol Eng, 5
J Adamowski, HF Chan, SO Prasher, VN Sharda (2012)
Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines with coupled wavelet transform artificial neural networks for runoff forecasting in Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited dataJ Hydroinform, 044
G Tayfur, VP Singh (2006)
ANN and fuzzy logic models for simulating event-based rainfall–runoffJ Hydraul Eng ASCE, 132
JE Nash, JV Sutcliffe (1970)
River flow forecasting through conceptual models; part I—a discussion of principlesJ Hydrol, 10
AY Shamseldin, KO O’Connor (1996)
A nearest neighbour linear perturbation model for river flow forecastingJ Hydrol, 179
N Vahid, P Masoumeh (2013)
Conjunction of SOM-based feature extraction method and hybrid wavelet-ANN approach for rainfall–runoff modelingJ Hydroinform, 141
J Yu, S Wang, L Xi (2008)
Evolving artificial neural networks using an improved PSO and DPSONeurocomputing, 71
J Wang, R Zhang, G Xu (1985)
Constrained linear system model and its application in flood forecasting of the Han RiverJ China Hydrol, 1
S Yakowitz (1987)
Nearest neighbor methods for time series analysisJ Time Ser Anal, 8
G Galeati (1990)
A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for runoff forecastingHydrol Sci J, 35
MT Dastorani, JS Koochi, HS Darani, A Talebi, MH Rahimian (2013)
River instantaneous peak flow estimation using daily flow data and machine-learning-based modelsJ Hydroinform, 245
P Coulibaly, F Anctil, B Bobée (2000)
Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approachJ Hydrol, 230
J Wang, R Zhang, G Xu (1987)
Synthesized constrained linear systemJ Hydraul Eng ASCE, 7
SMR Loghmanian, HJR Ahmad, RYM Khalid (2012)
Structure optimization of neural network for dynamic system modeling using multi-objective genetic algorithmNeural Comput Appl, 21
A new hybrid data-driven model named PBK has been proposed to improve the event-based rainfall–runoff simulation. The PBK is developed by coupling partial mutual information-based input variable selection (IVS), ensemble back-propagation neural network (EBPNN)-based discharge forecasting and K-nearest neighbor algorithm-based discharge error forecasting. This model is proposed for solving the hard problem of how to implement non-updating rainfall–runoff simulation by data-driven models. For the purpose of solving the hard problems, the PBK model has the following innovations and improvements: (1) a newly proposed non-updating modeling approach without the using of the real-time information and can obtain higher simulation accuracy; (2) a newly proposed IVS scheme and a newly proposed candidate rainfall input set to ensure the adequacy and parsimony of the rainfall and antecedent discharge input variables; and (3) a newly proposed calibration method for the EBPNN to ensure higher simulation accuracy and better generalization property. This method is a combination of the NGSA-II, Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, and the AIC-based combination weights generating method. For the purpose of comparing simulation accuracy with traditional non-updating data-driven models, a back-propagation neural network model (PB_R) and a linear model (CLS) were also studied. This study utilized event flood data of Dongwan catchment for intercomparisons between different models. The simulation results indicated that the PBK model outperforms other data-driven models and has higher accuracy and better forecasting capability.
Neural Computing and Applications – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 28, 2016
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.