A Method of Grouping Projects for Comparisons

A Method of Grouping Projects for Comparisons Most methods currently available for grouping an agency fundedprojects are well suited for continuous data (e.g., Dalenius and Hodges Cum √ frule) but not for grouping a few projects based on their means. This is because these projectmeans form a set of discrete observations. So, applying Dalenius and Hodges Cum √ frule to such discrete observations generally does not help in forming as homogeneousgroups as one would desire. Seeking more homogeneous groups in practice is necessary becauseoften an administrator needs as accurate comparisons among projects as possible (e.g.,evaluation of project performances) to make correct decisions about continuation or administrationof agency funded projects. Therefore, in this paper an iterative procedure is given togroup projects in such a situation. To apply this procedure, the only requirement is that the variableused for stratification is not a categorical or a nominal variable. The iterative procedure isillustrated by three examples. As should be expected, the procedure yields a different and morehomogeneous set of strata than the one obtained by the Cum √ f rule. For administration ofprojects, to form as homogeneous a group of projects as possible is important and , therefore,it is advisable to use this procedure to achieve more homogeneous strata for the data at hand. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

A Method of Grouping Projects for Comparisons

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/a-method-of-grouping-projects-for-comparisons-bfbHnFCU4V
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Social Sciences; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1023319322594
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Most methods currently available for grouping an agency fundedprojects are well suited for continuous data (e.g., Dalenius and Hodges Cum √ frule) but not for grouping a few projects based on their means. This is because these projectmeans form a set of discrete observations. So, applying Dalenius and Hodges Cum √ frule to such discrete observations generally does not help in forming as homogeneousgroups as one would desire. Seeking more homogeneous groups in practice is necessary becauseoften an administrator needs as accurate comparisons among projects as possible (e.g.,evaluation of project performances) to make correct decisions about continuation or administrationof agency funded projects. Therefore, in this paper an iterative procedure is given togroup projects in such a situation. To apply this procedure, the only requirement is that the variableused for stratification is not a categorical or a nominal variable. The iterative procedure isillustrated by three examples. As should be expected, the procedure yields a different and morehomogeneous set of strata than the one obtained by the Cum √ f rule. For administration ofprojects, to form as homogeneous a group of projects as possible is important and , therefore,it is advisable to use this procedure to achieve more homogeneous strata for the data at hand.

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 17, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off