A meta-analysis of optimum plane placement and related morbidity in primary breast augmentation

A meta-analysis of optimum plane placement and related morbidity in primary breast augmentation Despite extensive clinical experience of breast implants, there is continued controversy regarding the optimum placement of the prosthesis. More importantly, there is insufficient data to accurately determine whether subglandular (SG) or submuscular (SM) placement of the prosthesis diminishes postoperative complications. A search of published trials ( n = 34) examined complication rates following SG and SM implant placement was conducted. Pubmed (MEDLINE) database was used and the available data was then cross-referenced. Eligible trials ( n = 6) were then reviewed and selected data extracted. Primary outcomes measured were postoperative haematoma, infection, capsular contracture and implant migration. 3603 patients were identified from relevant trials examining postoperative complication rates for both subglandular and submuscular implant planes. The submuscular implant plane was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative haematoma (OR 2.87, 95% CI, 1.44-6.11). The incidence of capsular contracture (OR 4.77) is more common when a subglandular plane is used. No significant difference was noted in the rate of postoperative infection (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.57-2.58) or implant migration (OR 1.56, 95%CI 0.12-87.4) between the two groups. This meta-analysis confirms that subglandular augmentation results in lower short-term morbidity; however, submuscular placement appears to provide the best long-term outcome in terms of morbidity. In the absence of randomized controlled trials comparing these two techniques, this meta-analysis provides evidence to guide surgeons to achieve the best outcomes for their patients. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

A meta-analysis of optimum plane placement and related morbidity in primary breast augmentation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/a-meta-analysis-of-optimum-plane-placement-and-related-morbidity-in-zAefgpXRK8
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-010-0425-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Despite extensive clinical experience of breast implants, there is continued controversy regarding the optimum placement of the prosthesis. More importantly, there is insufficient data to accurately determine whether subglandular (SG) or submuscular (SM) placement of the prosthesis diminishes postoperative complications. A search of published trials ( n = 34) examined complication rates following SG and SM implant placement was conducted. Pubmed (MEDLINE) database was used and the available data was then cross-referenced. Eligible trials ( n = 6) were then reviewed and selected data extracted. Primary outcomes measured were postoperative haematoma, infection, capsular contracture and implant migration. 3603 patients were identified from relevant trials examining postoperative complication rates for both subglandular and submuscular implant planes. The submuscular implant plane was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative haematoma (OR 2.87, 95% CI, 1.44-6.11). The incidence of capsular contracture (OR 4.77) is more common when a subglandular plane is used. No significant difference was noted in the rate of postoperative infection (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.57-2.58) or implant migration (OR 1.56, 95%CI 0.12-87.4) between the two groups. This meta-analysis confirms that subglandular augmentation results in lower short-term morbidity; however, submuscular placement appears to provide the best long-term outcome in terms of morbidity. In the absence of randomized controlled trials comparing these two techniques, this meta-analysis provides evidence to guide surgeons to achieve the best outcomes for their patients.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 2010

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off