Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jochen Ranger, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, J. Gaviria (2014)
A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in TestsPsychometrika, 80
EE Roskam (1997)
Handbook of modern item response theory
E. Andersen (1973)
CONDITIONAL INFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE‐CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRESBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26
G Rasch (1960)
Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests
P. Rijn, Usama Ali (2017)
A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testingBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70
G. Maris, H. Maas (2012)
Speed-Accuracy Response Models: Scoring Rules based on Response Time and AccuracyPsychometrika, 77
P. Rijn, Usama Ali (2018)
SARM: A Computer Program for Estimating Speed‐Accuracy Response Models for Dichotomous ItemsETS Research Report Series, 2018
J. Stoyanov (2008)
Saddlepoint Approximations with ApplicationsJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 171
E. Roskam (1997)
Models for Speed and Time-Limit Tests
S. Haberman (2016)
Exponential Family Distributions Relevant to IRT
S. Haberman (2013)
A GENERAL PROGRAM FOR ITEM‐RESPONSE ANALYSIS THAT EMPLOYS THE STABILIZED NEWTON–RAPHSON ALGORITHMETS Research Report Series, 2013
T. Louis (1982)
Finding the Observed Information Matrix When Using the EM AlgorithmJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 44
L. Thurstone (1937)
Ability, motivation, and speedPsychometrika, 2
J. Naylor, A. Smith (1982)
Applications of a Method for the Efficient Computation of Posterior DistributionsJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series C-applied Statistics, 31
J. Wim (2007)
A HIERARCHICAL FRAMEWORK FOR MODELING SPEED AND ACCURACY ON TEST ITEMS
WJ Linden van der (2007)
10.1007/s11336-006-1478-zPsychometrika, 72
H.L.J. Maas, E. Wagenmakers (2005)
A psychometric analysis of chess expertise.The American journal of psychology, 118 1
F. Lord, M. Novick, A. Birnbaum (1966)
Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability
S. Haberman, S. Sinharay (2013)
Generalized Residuals for General Models for Contingency Tables With Application to Item Response TheoryJournal of the American Statistical Association, 108
Jeffrey Rouder, Dongchu Sun, P. Speckman, Jun Lu, Duo Zhou (2003)
A hierarchical bayesian statistical framework for response time distributionsPsychometrika, 68
F. Lord, M. Wingersky (1984)
Comparison of IRT True-Score and Equipercentile Observed-Score "Equatings"Applied Psychological Measurement, 8
M. Marsman (2009)
Plausible values in statistical inference
RW Butler (2007)
10.1017/CBO9780511619083
E. Ziegel (2002)
Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear ModelsTechnometrics, 44
Seonghoon Kim (2012)
A Note on the Reliability Coefficients for Item Response Model-Based Ability EstimatesPsychometrika, 77
Martin Biehler, H. Holling, Philipp Doebler (2015)
Saddlepoint Approximations of the Distribution of the Person Parameter in the Two Parameter Logistic ModelPsychometrika, 80
P. Rijn, F. Rijmen (2015)
On the explaining-away phenomenon in multivariate latent variable models.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 68 1
(2016)
Diffusion-based item response modeling
(1977)
Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
K. Yuan, Ying Cheng, Jeffrey Patton (2014)
Information Matrices and Standard Errors for MLEs of Item Parameters in IRTPsychometrika, 79
W. Linden (2008)
Using Response Times for Item Selection in Adaptive TestingJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33
F. Lord (1975)
FORMULA SCORING AND NUMBER-RIGHT SCORING1Journal of Educational Measurement, 12
(1927)
The abilities of men
Frank Goldhammer (2015)
Measuring Ability, Speed, or Both? Challenges, Psychometric Solutions, and What Can Be Gained From Experimental ControlMeasurement, 13
Yi-Hsuan Lee, Haiwen Chen (2011)
A review of recent response-time analyses in educational testing
S. Haberman (2006)
JOINT AND CONDITIONAL ESTIMATION FOR IMPLICIT MODELS FOR TESTS WITH POLYTOMOUS ITEM SCORESETS Research Report Series, 2006
G. Hooker, M. Finkelman, A. Schwartzman (2009)
Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response TheoryPsychometrika, 74
Seonghoon Kim (2013)
Generalization of the Lord‐Wingersky Algorithm to Computing the Distribution of Summed Test Scores Based on Real‐Number Item ScoresJournal of Educational Measurement, 50
F. Tuerlinckx, P. Boeck (2005)
Two interpretations of the discrimination parameterPsychometrika, 70
F Tuerlinckx, D Molenaar, HLJ Maas (2016)
Handbook of item response theory
P. Boeck, Haiqin Chen, M. Davison (2017)
Spontaneous and imposed speed of cognitive test responsesBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70
Jochen Ranger, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn (2012)
A flexible latent trait model for response times in testsPsychometrika, 77
W. Linden (2009)
Conceptual Issues in Response-Time Modeling.Journal of Educational Measurement, 46
A Birnbaum (1968)
Statistical theories of mental test scores
S. Haberman, S. Sinharay, K. Chon (2013)
Assessing Item Fit for Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models Using Residuals from Estimated Item Response FunctionsPsychometrika, 78
L. Thurstone (1919)
A scoring method for mental tests.Psychological Bulletin, 16
T Louis (1982)
10.2307/2345828Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 44
X. Meng, D. Rubin (1991)
Using EM to Obtain Asymptotic Variance-Covariance Matrices: The SEM AlgorithmJournal of the American Statistical Association, 86
(1986)
Response times
We propose a generalization of the speed–accuracy response model (SARM) introduced by Maris and van der Maas (Psychometrika 77:615–633, 2012). In these models, the scores that result from a scoring rule that incorporates both the speed and accuracy of item responses are modeled. Our generalization is similar to that of the one-parameter logistic (or Rasch) model to the two-parameter logistic (or Birnbaum) model in item response theory. An expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm for estimating model parameters and standard errors was developed. Furthermore, methods to assess model fit are provided in the form of generalized residuals for item score functions and saddlepoint approximations to the density of the sum score. The presented methods were evaluated in a small simulation study, the results of which indicated good parameter recovery and reasonable type I error rates for the residuals. Finally, the methods were applied to two real data sets. It was found that the two-parameter SARM showed improved fit compared to the one-parameter SARM in both data sets.
Psychometrika – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 21, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.