A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use

A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:1436–1437 DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4823-z CORRESPONDENCE A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use Discussion on “Accuracy of esophageal pressure to assess transpulmonary pressure during mechanical ventilation” 1* 2 2 3 4 Elias Baedorf Kassis , Stephen H. Loring , Daniel Talmor , Pierpaolo Terragni , Luciana Mascia and V. Marco Ranieri © 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM avoided choosing a specific correction value, recognizing Initial correspondence from Dr. Baedorf Kassis inter-individual variation and uncertainty in this relation- et al. ship [2]. While we admire the elegance of Terragni’s study Dear Editor, and are excited to see further work, the use of P in esti- We read with interest the letter by Terragni [1] describing es mating transpulmonary pressure and parenchymal stress a marvelous experiment before and after lung transplan- must be understood in the context of these uncertainties, tation which suggested that pleural pressure is 5 cmH O and we are cautious about over-interpretation and clini- lower than esophageal pressure (P ). We have made es cal application. similar estimates based on the 3–7  cmH O increase in P moving from upright to supine, but there is consider- es Reply from Dr. Terragni et al. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Intensive Care Medicine Springer Journals

A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/a-fixed-correction-of-absolute-transpulmonary-pressure-may-not-be-2eKxx1ff3Q
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Intensive / Critical Care Medicine; Anesthesiology; Emergency Medicine; Pneumology/Respiratory System; Pain Medicine; Pediatrics
ISSN
0342-4642
eISSN
1432-1238
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00134-017-4823-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:1436–1437 DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4823-z CORRESPONDENCE A fixed correction of absolute transpulmonary pressure may not be ideal for clinical use Discussion on “Accuracy of esophageal pressure to assess transpulmonary pressure during mechanical ventilation” 1* 2 2 3 4 Elias Baedorf Kassis , Stephen H. Loring , Daniel Talmor , Pierpaolo Terragni , Luciana Mascia and V. Marco Ranieri © 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM avoided choosing a specific correction value, recognizing Initial correspondence from Dr. Baedorf Kassis inter-individual variation and uncertainty in this relation- et al. ship [2]. While we admire the elegance of Terragni’s study Dear Editor, and are excited to see further work, the use of P in esti- We read with interest the letter by Terragni [1] describing es mating transpulmonary pressure and parenchymal stress a marvelous experiment before and after lung transplan- must be understood in the context of these uncertainties, tation which suggested that pleural pressure is 5 cmH O and we are cautious about over-interpretation and clini- lower than esophageal pressure (P ). We have made es cal application. similar estimates based on the 3–7  cmH O increase in P moving from upright to supine, but there is consider- es Reply from Dr. Terragni et al.

Journal

Intensive Care MedicineSpringer Journals

Published: May 15, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off