Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. H. Riker (1982)
Liberalism Against Populism
J. L. Sundquist (1983)
Dynamics of the Party System
W. J. Stone, R. B. Rapoport, A. I. Abramowitz (1990)
The Parties Respond
Richard Herrera (1995)
The Crosswinds of Change: Sources of Change in the Democratic and Republican PartiesPolitical Research Quarterly, 48
R. Herrera (1992)
The understanding of ideological labels by political elites: A research noteWestern Political Quarterly, 45
John Aldrich, M. McGinnis (1989)
A model of party constraints on optimal candidate positionsMathematical and Computer Modelling, 12
Geoffrey Layman (1999)
“Culture Wars” in the American Party SystemAmerican Politics Research, 27
H. Chappell, W. Keech (1986)
Policy Motivation and Party Differences in a Dynamic Spatial Model of Party CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 80
P. Converse, G. Markus (1979)
Plus ça change…: The New CPS Election Study PanelAmerican Political Science Review, 73
E. Carmines, J. Stimson (1989)
Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics
V. Key (1959)
Secular Realignment and the Party SystemThe Journal of Politics, 21
John Aldrich (1995)
Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in AmericaThe Journal of American History, 83
Richard Herrera (1992)
The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research NotePolitical Research Quarterly, 45
John Aldrich (1983)
A Downsian Spatial Model with Party ActivismAmerican Political Science Review, 77
V. Key (1955)
A Theory of Critical ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 17
John Aldrich (1983)
A spatial model with party activists: implications for electoral dynamicsPublic Choice, 41
Ronald Rapoport, W. Stone (1994)
A model for disaggregating political changePolitical Behavior, 16
R. Huckfeldt, C. Kohfeld (1992)
Electoral stability and the decline of class in democratic politicsMathematical and Computer Modelling, 16
(1988)
in Longitudinal
J. Guth, Corwin Smidt, Lyman Kellstedt, John Green (1993)
The Sources of Antiabortion AttitudesAmerican Politics Research, 21
J. C. Green, J. L. Guth, C. E. Smidt, L. A. Kellstedt (1996)
Religion and the Culture Wars
G. Adams (1997)
Abortion: Evidence of an Issue EvolutionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 41
R. Alvarez, John Brehm, Stable Url (1995)
American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing ValuesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 39
B. Berelson, P. Lazarsfeld, W. McPhee (1954)
Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign
Geoffrey Layman, T. Carsey (1998)
Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual-Level Change on the Abortion IssuePolitical Research Quarterly, 51
R. Huckfeldt, C. Kohfeld, Thomas Likens (1982)
Dynamic Modeling: An Introduction
W. J. Stone (1991)
What do we know?American Journal of Political Science, 35
W. Stone (1991)
Response: Response to Clark, Bruce, Kessel, and Jacoby's "I'd Rather Switch than Fight: On Party Switching among Presidential Activists: What Do We Know?American Journal of Political Science, 35
(1967)
Party Systems and Voter Alignments
I. Horowitz, J. Hunter (1994)
Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War.Social Forces, 73
Stuart Macdonald, G. Rabinowitz (1987)
The Dynamics of Structural RealignmentAmerican Political Science Review, 81
A. Przeworski, J. Sprague (1986)
Paper Stones
E. C. w. Ladd, C. D. Hadley (1975)
Transformations of the American Party System
W. E. Miller, M. K. Jennings (1986)
Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters
Hanes Walton, R. Huckfeldt, C. Kohfeld (1989)
Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics
In this article, we develop a dynamic model of aggregate attitudinal change among party activists in order to better understand the process by which new issues/cleavages divide major political parties. We build on existing research by developing a model of change that incorporates both conversion among continuing activists and the replacement of previous activists with newcomers who hold different views. We first explore such change among activists of the two major parties in the United States on the abortion issue. We then consider a number of alternative specifications of the model in order to generalize our findings. We conclude that conversion among continuing activists contributes in a substantial way to aggregate change among party activists by influencing the level of change, accelerating the change process, and sustaining change over time.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.