Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J Baluja, M Diago, P Goovaerts, J Tardaguila (2012)
Assessment of the spatial variability of anthocyanins in grapes using a fluorescence sensor: Relationships with vine vigour and yieldPrecision Agriculture, 13
TD Jordan, RM Pool, TJ Zabadal, JP Tompkins (1981)
Cultural practices for commercial vineyards; miscellaneous bulletin 111
S Stamatiadis, D Taskos, E Tsadila, C Christofides, C Tsadilas, JS Schepers (2010)
Comparison of passive and active canopy sensors for the estimation of vine biomass productionPrecision Agriculture, 11
P Clifford, S Richardson, D Hemon (1989)
Testing the association between two spatial processesBiometrics, 45
PJ Curran (1983)
Multispectral remote sensing for the estimation of green leaf area indexPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A, 309
P Dutilleul (1993)
Modifying the t-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processesBiometrics, 49
CM Beale, JJ Lennon, JM Yearsley, MJ Brewer, DA Elston (2010)
Regression analysis of spatial dataEcology Letters, 13
C Yang, JH Everitt (2012)
Using spectral distance, spectral angle and plant abundance derived from hyperspectral imagery to characterize crop yield variationPrecision Agriculture, 13
R Drissi, J-P Goutouly, D Forget, J-P Gaudillere (2009)
Nondestructive measurement of grapevine leaf area by ground normalized difference vegetation indexAgronomy Journal, 101
CF Dormann, JM McPherson, MB Araujo, R Bivand, J Bolliger, G Carl (2007)
Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A reviewEcography, 30
MS Rosenberg, CD Anderson (2011)
PASSaGE: Pattern Analysis, Spatial Statistics and Geographic Exegesis. Version 2Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2
A Hall, DW Lamb, BP Holzapfel, JP Louis (2011)
Within-season temporal variation in correlations between vineyard canopy and winegrape composition and yieldPrecision Agriculture, 12
Pearson’s correlation is a commonly used descriptive statistic in many published precision agriculture studies, not only in the Precision Agriculture Journal, but also in other journals that publish in this domain. Very few of these articles take into consideration auto-correlation in data when performing correlation analysis, despite a statistical solution being available. A brief discussion on the need to consider auto-correlation and the effective sample size when using Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture research is presented. The discussion is supported by an example using spatial data on vine size and canopy vigour in a juice-grape vineyard. The example data demonstrated that the p-value of the correlation between vine size and canopy vigour increased when auto-correlation was accounted for, potentially to a non-significant level depending on the desired α-level. The example data also demonstrated that the method by which data are processed (interpolated) to achieve co-located data will also affect the amount of auto-correlation and the effective sample size. The results showed that for the same variables, with different approaches to data co-location, a lower r-value may have a lower p-value and potentially hold more statistical significance.
Precision Agriculture – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 23, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.