Support Care Cancer (2018) 26:1215–1220 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3944-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A discrete choice experiment to assess cancer patients’ preferences for when and how to make treatment decisions 1 1 1 2 Anne Herrmann & Rob Sanson-Fisher & Alix Hall & Laura Wall & 3 1 Nicholas Zdenkowski & Amy Waller Received: 16 July 2017 /Accepted: 23 October 2017 /Published online: 31 October 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract written and online information rather than just written infor- Purpose Cancer patients can be overwhelmed when being mation. This preference was statistically significant (p <0.01). confronted with their diagnosis and treatment options. Such Fifty-nine percent (n = 86) of patients preferred two 20-min information is often provided during one consultation between consultations over one 40-min consultation when making a the patient and treating clinician. In order to achieve optimal treatment decision. Significantly, more patients preferred two cancer care, there may be justification for alternative consul- shorter consultations rather than one longer consultation when tation styles. We assessed, in a sample of adult medical oncol- this was combined with written and online information ogy patients, their preferences for (i) attending one 40-min (p <0.01). consultation or two 20-min consultations and (ii) receiving Conclusion When
Supportive Care in Cancer – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 31, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera