A conceptual framework for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis with regard to site-specific nitrogen application

A conceptual framework for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis with regard to... In this study we derive a test that aims to show that the economic optimum nitrogen applications in site-specific management zones are different. In addition, a confidence interval is derived for the difference between optima, and here we show that separate confidence intervals for either optimum are not as good as the former for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis. Both the test and the confidence interval for the difference are based on modeling the returns above N fertilizer cost by quadratic functions of the nitrogen rate. The data are from an N-rate trial at a heterogeneous field in Thalhausen, Germany. This trial could barely support the economic benefit of precision agriculture. A statistical proof that high- and low-yielding zones should be discriminated against just failed to meet the standard 5% level. We also discuss what design of nitrogen fertilizer levels should be used for the test and the confidence intervals. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

A conceptual framework for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis with regard to site-specific nitrogen application

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/a-conceptual-framework-for-judging-the-precision-agriculture-PGhfqKm3TF
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-008-9069-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this study we derive a test that aims to show that the economic optimum nitrogen applications in site-specific management zones are different. In addition, a confidence interval is derived for the difference between optima, and here we show that separate confidence intervals for either optimum are not as good as the former for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis. Both the test and the confidence interval for the difference are based on modeling the returns above N fertilizer cost by quadratic functions of the nitrogen rate. The data are from an N-rate trial at a heterogeneous field in Thalhausen, Germany. This trial could barely support the economic benefit of precision agriculture. A statistical proof that high- and low-yielding zones should be discriminated against just failed to meet the standard 5% level. We also discuss what design of nitrogen fertilizer levels should be used for the test and the confidence intervals.

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 10, 2008

References

  • Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site-specific yield response
    Bullock, D. S.; Lowenberg-DeBoer, J.; Swinton, S. M.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off