Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Winemiller, A. Flecker, D. Hoeinghaus (2010)
Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems, 29
E. Keller (1971)
Areal Sorting of Bed-Load Material: The Hypothesis of Velocity ReversalGeological Society of America Bulletin, 82
N. Poff, J. Ward (1990)
Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneityEnvironmental Management, 14
M. Bogan, D. Lytle (2007)
Seasonal flow variation allows 'time-sharing' by disparate aquatic insect communities in montane desert streamsFreshwater Biology, 52
L. Poff, J. Olden, N. Vieira, D. Finn, M. Simmons, R. Mackay, R. Mackay, N. Poff, B. Kondratieff (2006)
Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships, 25
P. Brussock, Arthur Brown (1991)
Riffle-pool geomorphology disrupts longitudinal patterns of stream benthosHydrobiologia, 220
C. Townsend (1989)
The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community EcologyJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 8
P. Brussock, Arthur Brown, J. Dixon (1985)
CHANNEL FORM AND STREAM ECOSYSTEM MODELSJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 21
P. Logan, M. Brooker (1983)
The macroinvertebrate faunas of riffles and poolsWater Research, 17
S. Cooper, H. Page, S. Wiseman, Kristie Klose, D. Bennett, Thomas Even, S. Sadro, Craig Nelson, T. Dudley (2015)
Physicochemical and biological responses of streams to wildfire severity in riparian zonesFreshwater Biology, 60
FRANçOIS Chevene, Sylvain Doléadec, D. Chessel (1994)
A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological dataFreshwater Biology, 31
Allison Roy, A. Rosemond, D. Leigh, M. Paul, J. Wallace (2003)
Habitat-specific responses of stream insects to land cover disturbance: biological consequences and monitoring implicationsJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 22
N. Bonada, M. Rieradevall, N. Prat, V. Resh (2006)
Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-climate streams of northern California, 25
J. Flannagan (1979)
An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America.Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly, 36
E. Stanley, S. Fisher, N. Grimm (1997)
Ecosystem Expansion and Contraction in Streams Desert streams vary in both space and time and fluctuate dramatically in sizeBioScience, 47
A. O’Dowd, A. Chin (2016)
Do bio-physical attributes of steps and pools differ in high-gradient mountain streams?Hydrobiologia, 776
K. Boersma, L. Dee, Steve Miller, M. Bogan, D. Lytle, A. Gitelman (2016)
Linking multidimensional functional diversity to quantitative methods: a graphical hypothesis--evaluation framework.Ecology, 97 3
D. Herbst, E. Silldorff, S. Cooper (2009)
The influence of introduced trout on the benthic communities of paired headwater streams in the Sierra Nevada of CaliforniaFreshwater Biology, 54
K. Gilman (1993)
Stream hydrology: An introduction for ecologistsEcological Engineering, 2
B. Statzner, B. Higler (1986)
Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patternsFreshwater Biology, 16
C. Frissell, W. Liss, C. Warren, M. Hurley (1986)
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed contextEnvironmental Management, 10
D. Montgomery (1999)
PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35
ML MacWilliams, JM Wheaton, GB Pasternack, RL Street, PK Kitanidis (2006)
Flow convergence routing hypothesis for pool-riffle maintenance in alluvial riversWater Resources Research, 42
A. Huryn, James Wallace (1987)
Local Geomorphology as a Determinant of Macrofaunal Production in a Mountain Stream.Ecology, 68 6
P. Kaufmann, Paul Levine, E. Robison, C. Seeliger, D. Peck (1999)
Quantifying physical habitat in wadeable streams : surface waters
C. Townsend, A. Hildrew (1994)
Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systemsFreshwater Biology, 31
J. Carter, V. Resh (2001)
After site selection and before data analysis: sampling, sorting, and laboratory procedures used in stream benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring programs by USA state agenciesJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 20
WL Hilsenhoff (1991)
Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates
(2003)
Stream invertebrate responses to trout introductions : results from large - scale studies in the central Sierra Nevada and Yosemite National Park
B. Statzner, L. Bêche (2010)
Can biological invertebrate traits resolve effects of multiple stressors on running water ecosystemsFreshwater Biology, 55
R. DeWalt, V. Resh, W. Hilsenhoff (2010)
Diversity and Classification of Insects and Collembola
M. MacWilliams, J. Wheaton, G. Pasternack, Robert Street, P. Kitanidis (2006)
Aberystwyth University Flow convergence routing hypothesis for pool-riffle maintenance in alluvial rivers
EH Stanley, SG Fisher, NB Grimm (1997)
Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streamsBioScience, 47
(2006)
Estimation and application of macroinvertebrate tolerance values. EPA/600/P-04/116-F, US Environmental Protection Agency
P. Ode, A. Rehn, R. Mazor, K. Schiff, E. Stein, J. May, L. Brown, D. Herbst, David Gillett, Kevin Lunde, C. Hawkins (2016)
Evaluating the adequacy of a reference-site pool for ecological assessments in environmentally complex regionsFreshwater Science, 35
J. Carter, S. Fend (2001)
Inter-annual changes in the benthic community structure of riffles and pools in reaches of contrasting gradientHydrobiologia, 459
R. Mazor, A. Rehn, P. Ode, M. Engeln, K. Schiff, E. Stein, David Gillett, D. Herbst, C. Hawkins (2016)
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an index for consistent meaning in different settingsFreshwater Science, 35
Marcos Silva, B. Rosa, R. Alves (2015)
Effect of mesohabitats on responses of invertebrate community structure in streams under different land usesEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187
PP Brussock, AV Brown, JC Dixon (1985)
Channel form and stream ecosystem modelsWater Resources Bulletin, 21
C. Hunsaker, Thomas Whitaker, R. Bales (2012)
Snowmelt Runoff and Water Yield Along Elevation and Temperature Gradients in California’s Southern Sierra Nevada 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48
(2008)
Ecology and distribution of aquatic insects
A. Benke, A. Huryn, L. Smock, J. Wallace (1999)
Length-Mass Relationships for Freshwater Macroinvertebrates in North America with Particular Reference to the Southeastern United StatesJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 18
S. Cooper, T. Dudley (1988)
The interpretation of controlled vs natural experiments in streamsOikos, 52
David Johnson, C. Hunsaker, D. Glass, B. Rau, B. Roath (2011)
Carbon and nutrient contents in soils from the Kings River Experimental Watersheds, Sierra Nevada Mountains, CaliforniaGeoderma, 160
(1999)
Appendix B, of Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish
(2013)
National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013-2014: field Operations Manual-Wadeable. EPA-841-B-12-007
G. Poole (2002)
Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuumFreshwater Biology, 47
D. Montgomery, J. Buffington (1997)
Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basinsGeological Society of America Bulletin, 109
N. Vieira, N. Poff, D. Carlisle, S. Moulton, M. Koski, B. Kondratieff (2006)
A database of lotic invertebrate traits for North America
Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg (1995)
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 57
F. Ahnert, L. Leopold, M. Wolman, J. Miller (1965)
Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology
J. Finlay, Sapna Khandwala, M. Power (2002)
Spatial scales of carbon flow in a river food webEcology, 83
E. Rosi-Marshall, K. Vallis, C. Baxter, J. Davis (2016)
Retesting a prediction of the River Continuum Concept: autochthonous versus allochthonous resources in the diets of invertebratesFreshwater Science, 35
AV Brown, PP Brussock (1991)
Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and poolsHydrobiologia, 220
Macroinvertebrate community taxonomic and trait structure showed consistent differences between riffles and pools across 12 headwater streams in the Sierra Nevada (California) even as flows varied from wet to dry years and between seasons. Densities of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Elmidae, Orthocladiinae and Diamesinae midges, and mites were greater in riffles, whereas Tanypodinae, Chironominae, Sialis, and Pisidium were more abundant in pools. Pools had higher densities but estimated biomass was greater in riffles. Collector-gatherer and micropredator abundances were greater in pools whereas grazers, collector-filterers, and macropredators were more abundant in riffles. Stonefly shredders were most abundant in riffles but some caddis shredders were more abundant in pools. Trait state patterns were related to food resource and physical habitat differences between riffles and pools. Of the distinct pool–riffle differences we found among taxa, only about half conformed to expectations from the literature. Pool and riffle assemblages were most dissimilar at intermediate discharge and converged at low and high flows when one or the other habitat dominated. Bioassessment sampling will need to account for these flow-related differences. Benthic invertebrate communities in these mountain streams clearly differ between pools and riffles, but the relative extent of habitats and biological similarity shift with flow regime.
Hydrobiologia – Springer Journals
Published: May 30, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.