Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Steven Brown, J. Tiernan, K. Biggs, D. Hind, Neil Shephard, M. Bradburn, A. Wailoo, A. Alshreef, Lizzie Swaby, A. Watson, S. Radley, Oliver Jones, P. Skaife, Anil Agarwal, P. Giordano, M. Lamah, M. Cartmell, J. Davies, O. Faiz, K. Nugent, A. Clarke, A. Macdonald, P. Conaghan, P. Ziprin, R. Makhija (2016)
The HubBLe Trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation.Health technology assessment, 20 88
V. Kahlke, J. Bock, H. Peleikis, J. Jongen (2011)
Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devicesLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 396
J. Gravié, P. Lehur, N. Huten, M. Papillon, M. Fantoli, B. Descottes, P. Pessaux, J. Arnaud (2005)
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial With 2-Year Postoperative Follow UpAnnals of Surgery, 242
D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P. Clavien (2004)
Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a SurveyAnnals of Surgery, 240
S. Giuratrabocchetta, G. Pecorella, A. Stazi, G. Tegon, M. Fazio, Donato Altomare (2013)
Safety and short‐term effectiveness of EEA stapler vs PPH stapler in the treatment of degree III haemorrhoids: prospective randomized controlled trialColorectal Disease, 15
C. Hoyuela, F. Carvajal, M. Juvany, D. Troyano, M. Trias, A. Martrat, J. Ardid, J. Obiols (2016)
HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up.International journal of surgery, 28
R. Gerjy, A. Lindhoff-Larson, P. Nyström (2008)
Grade of prolapse and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patientsColorectal Disease, 10
P. Lehur, Anne Didnée, J. Faucheron, G. Meurette, P. Zerbib, L. Siproudhis, B. Vinson-Bonnet, A. Dubois, C. Casa, J. Hardouin, I. Durand-zaleski (2016)
Cost-effectiveness of New Surgical Treatments for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Doppler-guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Mucopexy and Circular Stapled HemorrhoidopexyAnnals of Surgery, 264
A. Watson, J. Hudson, J. Wood, M. Kilonzo, Steven Brown, A. McDonald, J. Norrie, H. Bruhn, J. Cook (2016)
Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trialLancet (London, England), 388
S. Zaheer, Terence Reilly, J. Pembérton, Duane Ilstmp (1998)
Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseasesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 41
J. Faucheron, Y. Gangner (2008)
Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids: Early and Three-Year Follow-up Results in 100 Consecutive PatientsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 51
F. Pérez-Vicente, A. Arroyo, P. Serrano, F. Candela, A. Sánchez, R. Calpena (2004)
Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoidsInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 21
Robert Martin, M. Brennan, D. Jaques (2002)
Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical LiteratureAnnals of Surgery, 235
Xue Qi-ming, Xiang Jue-Ying, Chen Ben-hui, Wu Jing, L. Ning (2015)
Risk Factors for Postoperative Retention After Hemorrhoidectomy: A Cohort StudyGastroenterology Nursing, 38
Purpose Little is presently known on the impact of device type for Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation/mucopexy (DGHAL) or circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) when a surgical treatment is considered for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcome in terms of adverse events and recurrence rate, of patients included in the multicenter LigaLongo RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01240772) according to the type of devices used. Methods In the DGHAL arm (N = 193), the procedure was done with transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)™ (THD, Correggio, Italy) (104 patients) and with HAL-RAR™ (Agency for Medical Innovations (AMI) GmbH, Feldkirch, Austria) (89 patients). In the CSH arm (N = 184), procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)-03™ (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati OH) and hemorrhoidopexy and prolapse (HEM)™ (Covidien, Inc.) staplers were used in respectively 106 and 78 cases. Surgery- related morbidity at 90 postoperative days (POD) based on the Clavien-Dindo procedure-related complication score and clinical outcome in terms of recurrence and reoperation rate at 12 postoperative months (POM) was collected. Results Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomized according to HD grade. In the DGHAL arm, the number of ligations and mucopexies was higher in the AMI group (p < 0.0001); at 90
International Journal of Colorectal Disease – Springer Journals
Published: May 28, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.