Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy

A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the... Purpose Little is presently known on the impact of device type for Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation/mucopexy (DGHAL) or circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) when a surgical treatment is considered for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcome in terms of adverse events and recurrence rate, of patients included in the multicenter LigaLongo RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01240772) according to the type of devices used. Methods In the DGHAL arm (N = 193), the procedure was done with transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)™ (THD, Correggio, Italy) (104 patients) and with HAL-RAR™ (Agency for Medical Innovations (AMI) GmbH, Feldkirch, Austria) (89 patients). In the CSH arm (N = 184), procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)-03™ (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati OH) and hemorrhoidopexy and prolapse (HEM)™ (Covidien, Inc.) staplers were used in respectively 106 and 78 cases. Surgery- related morbidity at 90 postoperative days (POD) based on the Clavien-Dindo procedure-related complication score and clinical outcome in terms of recurrence and reoperation rate at 12 postoperative months (POM) was collected. Results Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomized according to HD grade. In the DGHAL arm, the number of ligations and mucopexies was higher in the AMI group (p < 0.0001); at 90 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Colorectal Disease Springer Journals

A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/a-comparison-of-surgical-devices-for-grade-ii-and-iii-hemorrhoidal-VIC671fPkY
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Surgery; Internal Medicine; Gastroenterology; Hepatology; Proctology
ISSN
0179-1958
eISSN
1432-1262
DOI
10.1007/s00384-018-3093-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose Little is presently known on the impact of device type for Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation/mucopexy (DGHAL) or circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) when a surgical treatment is considered for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcome in terms of adverse events and recurrence rate, of patients included in the multicenter LigaLongo RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01240772) according to the type of devices used. Methods In the DGHAL arm (N = 193), the procedure was done with transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)™ (THD, Correggio, Italy) (104 patients) and with HAL-RAR™ (Agency for Medical Innovations (AMI) GmbH, Feldkirch, Austria) (89 patients). In the CSH arm (N = 184), procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)-03™ (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati OH) and hemorrhoidopexy and prolapse (HEM)™ (Covidien, Inc.) staplers were used in respectively 106 and 78 cases. Surgery- related morbidity at 90 postoperative days (POD) based on the Clavien-Dindo procedure-related complication score and clinical outcome in terms of recurrence and reoperation rate at 12 postoperative months (POM) was collected. Results Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomized according to HD grade. In the DGHAL arm, the number of ligations and mucopexies was higher in the AMI group (p < 0.0001); at 90

Journal

International Journal of Colorectal Disease – Springer Journals

Published: May 28, 2018

References

  • The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation
    Brown, S; Tiernan, J; Biggs, K; Hind, D; Shephard, N; Bradburn, M; Wailoo, A; Alshreef, A; Swaby, L; Watson, A; Radley, S; Jones, O; Skaife, P; Agarwal, A; Giordano, P; Lamah, M; Cartmell, M; Davies, J; Faiz, O; Nugent, K; Clarke, A; MacDonald, A; Conaghan, P; Ziprin, P; Makhija, R
  • Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Watson, AJM; Hudson, J; Wood, J; Kilonzo, M; Brown, SR; McDonald, A; Norrie, J; Bruhn, H; Cook, JA
  • Cost-effectiveness of new surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal disease: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy
    Lehur, PA; Didnée, AS; Faucheron, J-L; Meurette, G; Zerbib, P; Siproudhis, L; Vinson-Bonnet, B; Dubois, A; Casa, C; Hardouin, JB; Durand-Zaleski, I
  • Grade of prolapse and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patients
    Gerjy, R; Lindhoff-Larson, A; Nyström, P-O
  • Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: early and three-year follow-up results in 100 consecutive patients
    Faucheron, JL; Gangner, Y
  • Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up
    Gravié, JF; Lehur, PA; Huten, N; Papillon, M; Fantoli, M; Descottes, B; Pessaux, P; Arnaud, JP
  • Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature
    Martin, RCG; Brennan, MF; Jaques, DP
  • Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D; Demartines, N; Clavien, P-A
  • HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up
    Hoyuela, C; Carvajal, F; Juvany, M; Troyano, D; Trias, M; Martrat, A; Ardid, J; Obiols, J
  • Safety and short-term effectiveness of EEA stapler vs PPH stapler in the treatment of degree III haemorrhoids: prospective randomized controlled trial
    Giuratrabocchetta, S; Pecorella, G; Stazi, A; Tegon, G; Fazio, M; Altomare, DF
  • Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices
    Kahlke, V; Bock, JU; Peleikis, HG; Jongen, J
  • Prospective randomised clinical trial of single versus double purse-string stapled mucosectomy in the treatment of prolapsed haemorrhoids
    Pérez-Vicente, F; Arroyo, A; Serrano, P; Candela, F; Sánchez, A; Calpena, R
  • Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases
    Zaheer, S; Reilly, WT; Pemberton, JH; Ilstrup, D
  • Risk factors for postoperative retention after hemorrhoidectomy: a cohort study
    Qi-Ming, X; Jue-Ying, X; Ben-Hui, C; Jing, W; Ning, L